DATACMNS-1208 - AbstractMappingContext.hasPersistentEntityFor(…) now properly considers cached absence.

AbstractMappingContext.hasPersistentEntityFor(…) now also properly consideres the empty Optional as non-presence as that is held to allow to distinguish between a type completely unkown to the context, or already known but not considered a persistent entity.

Related pull request: #258.

src/main/java/org/springframework/data/mapping/context/AbstractMappingContext.java

@@ -181,7 +181,9 @@ public abstract class AbstractMappingContext<E extends MutablePersistentEntity<?
 
 		Assert.notNull(type, "Type must not be null!");
 
-		return persistentEntities.containsKey(ClassTypeInformation.from(type));
+		Optional<E> entity = persistentEntities.get(ClassTypeInformation.from(type));
+
+		return entity == null ? false : entity.isPresent();
 	}
 
 	/*

src/test/java/org/springframework/data/mapping/context/AbstractMappingContextUnitTests.java

@@ -244,6 +244,16 @@ public class AbstractMappingContextUnitTests {
 				.isSameAs(context.getPersistentPropertyPath("persons.name", Sample.class));
 	}
 
+	@Test // DATACMNS-1208
+	public void ensureHasPersistentEntityReportsFalseForTypesThatShouldntBeCreated() {
+
+		SampleMappingContext context = new SampleMappingContext();
+
+		assertThat(context.hasPersistentEntityFor(String.class)).isFalse();
+		assertThat(context.getPersistentEntity(String.class)).isNull();
+		assertThat(context.hasPersistentEntityFor(String.class)).isFalse();
+	}
+
 	private static void assertHasEntityFor(Class<?> type, SampleMappingContext context, boolean expected) {
 
 		boolean found = false;