* use a single function to do Action Tokens Permission checks
* allows easier customization
* add basic tests
* lfs file locks should work now
---------
Signed-off-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR adds a quick approve button on PR page to allow reviewers to
approve all pending checks. Only users with write permission to the
Actions unit can approve.
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This commit adds the "You recently pushed to branch X" alert also to PR
overview, as opposed to only the repository's home page.
GitHub also shows this alert on the PR list, as well as the home page.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Extract from #34531
## Move Commit status state to a standalone package
Move the state from `structs` to `commitstatus` package. It also
introduce `CommitStatusStates` so that the combine function could be
used from UI and API logic.
## Combined commit status Changed
This PR will follow Github's combined commit status. Before this PR,
every commit status could be a combined one.
According to
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-the-combined-status-for-a-specific-reference
> Additionally, a combined state is returned. The state is one of:
> failure if any of the contexts report as error or failure
> pending if there are no statuses or a context is pending
> success if the latest status for all contexts is success
This PR will follow that rule and remove the `NoBetterThan` logic. This
also fixes the inconsistent between UI and API. In the API convert
package, it has implemented this which is different from the UI. It also
fixed the missing `URL` and `CommitURL` in the API.
## `CalcCommitStatus` return nil if there is no commit statuses
The behavior of `CalcCommitStatus` is changed. If the parameter commit
statuses is empty, it will return nil. The reference places should check
the returned value themselves.
Similar to #34544, this PR changes the `opts` argument in
`SearchRepositoryByName()` to be passed by value instead of by pointer,
as its mutations do not escape the function scope and are not used
elsewhere. This simplifies reasoning about the function and avoids
unnecessary pointer usage.
This insight emerged during an initial attempt to refactor
`RenderUserSearch()`, which currently intermixes multiple concerns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philip Peterson <philip-peterson@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix#28144
To make the resources will be cleanup once failed. All repository
operations now follow a consistent pattern:
- 1. Create a database record for the repository with the status
being_migrated.
- 2. Register a deferred cleanup function to delete the repository and
its related data if the operation fails.
- 3. Perform the actual Git and database operations step by step.
- 4. Upon successful completion, update the repository’s status to
ready.
The adopt operation is a special case — if it fails, the repository on
disk should not be deleted.
The pull request list API is slow, for every pull request, it needs to
open a git repository. Assume it has 30 records, there will be 30 sub
processes back because every repository will open a git cat-file --batch
sub process. This PR use base git repository to get the head commit id
rather than read it from head repository to avoid open any head git
repository.
When listing commits, Gitea attempts to retrieve the actual user based
on the commit email. Querying users one by one from the database is
inefficient. This PR optimizes the process by batch querying users by
email, reducing the number of database queries.
Fix#33271
Suppose there is a `branch-a` in fork repo:
1. if `branch-a` exists in base repo: try to sync `base:branch-a` to `fork:branch-a`
2. if `branch-a` doesn't exist in base repo: try to sync `base:main` to `fork:branch-a`
## Solves
Currently for rules to re-order them you have to alter the creation
date. so you basicly have to delete and recreate them in the right
order. This is more than just inconvinient ...
## Solution
Add a new col for prioritization
## Demo WebUI Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92182a31-9705-4ac5-b6e3-9bb74108cbd1
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
before if it was nonglob each load would try to glob it and the check
that is not glob ... now we only do that once and no future loading will
trigger it
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes#17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Fix#26685
If a commit status comes from Gitea Actions and the user cannot access
the repo's actions unit (the user does not have the permission or the
actions unit is disabled), a 404 page will occur after clicking the
"Details" link. We should hide the "Details" link in this case.
<img
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/68361714-b784-4bb5-baab-efde4221f466"
width="400px" />
Fixes#22722
### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).
The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.
### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.
It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.
This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)
This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`
### Updated Branch Protection UI:
<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">
### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The target_url is necessary for the UI, but missed in
commit_status_summary table. This PR fix it.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR adds a new table named commit status summary to reduce queries
from the commit status table. After this change, commit status summary
table will be used for the final result, commit status table will be for
details.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
This PR replaces the use of `max( id )`, and instead using ``max(
`index` )`` for determining the latest commit status. Building business
logic over an `auto_increment` primary key like `id` is risky and
there’re already plenty of discussions on the Internet.
There‘s no guarantee for `auto_increment` values to be monotonic,
especially upon failures or with a cluster. In the specific case, we met
the problem of commit statuses being outdated when using TiDB as the
database. As [being
documented](https://docs.pingcap.com/tidb/stable/auto-increment),
`auto_increment` values assigned to an `insert` statement will only be
monotonic on a per server (node) basis.
Closes#30074.
Unlike other async processing in the queue, we should sync branches to
the DB immediately when handling git hook calling. If it fails, users
can see the error message in the output of the git command.
It can avoid potential inconsistency issues, and help #29494.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
ChristopherHX
Kemal Zebari
Zettat123
wxiaoguang
Lunny Xiao
Naxdy
silverwind
Philip Peterson
badhezi
TheFox0x7
Chai-Shi
6543
Oleksandr Redko
Tim
Jason Song
yp05327
Henry Goodman
mzroot
Cheng
oliverpool
YR Chen