Tag creation/deletion was triggering push webhooks even when branch
filters were configured, causing unintended pipeline executions.
This change modifies the branch filter logic to check the full ref
name directly instead of first determining if it's a "branch" event.
Fixes: Tag events now properly respect branch filters
- Add getPayloadRef() function to extract full ref names
- Update PrepareWebhook() to use direct ref matching
- Prevents refs/tags/* from matching refs/heads/* filters
Closes#35449
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
# Fix Feishu Webhook Signature Verification
This PR implements proper signature verification for Feishu (Lark)
webhooks according to the [official
documentation](https://open.feishu.cn/document/client-docs/bot-v3/add-custom-bot).
## Changes
- Implemented the `GenSign` function based on Feishu's official Go
sample code
- Modified the webhook request creation to include timestamp and
signature in the payload when a secret is configured
- Fixed the signature generation algorithm to properly use HMAC-SHA256
with the correct string format
## Implementation Details
The signature verification works as follows:
1. When a webhook secret is provided, a timestamp is generated
2. The signature string is created using `timestamp + "\n" + secret`
3. The HMAC-SHA256 algorithm is applied to an empty string using the
signature string as the key
4. The result is Base64 encoded to produce the final signature
5. Both timestamp and signature are added to the payload
According to Feishu's documentation, the timestamp must be within 1 hour
(3600 seconds) of the current time to be considered valid.
## Security Note
Feishu emphasizes the importance of keeping webhook URLs secure. Do not
disclose them on GitHub, blogs, or any public sites to prevent
unauthorized use.
## References
- [Feishu Custom Bot
Documentation](https://open.feishu.cn/document/client-docs/bot-v3/add-custom-bot)
---------
Co-authored-by: hiifong <i@hiif.ong>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR changes 3rd party notifications wording on a PR review that
requests changes and can be considered a follow up for #5858 to also fix
#5857 in 3rd party notifications.
The difference in the actual notification would be the following:
```diff
- Pull request review rejected
+ Pull request review changes requested
```
While this is a simple string change at first look, it has a deeper UX
meaning.
# Motivation
We could observe that some developers are hesitant to press the "Request
changes" button since their peers first see that their changes were
rejected, thus a more appropriate wording that also falls in line with
the meaning and UI would be beneficial.
## Meaning
Pressing the `Request changes` button in a PR review means that as a
reviewer you are willing to merge the general change in a PR if changes
requested review comments are implemented.
Rejecting a PR on the other hand would be equivalent with closing it
since that change isn't welcome at all (e.g. out of scope feature).
## Sync with UI
The UI button says `request changes` and the other options
## Considered Problems
This might break some automation for users who rely on string matching.
Fixes [#34027](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/34027)
Discord does not allow for description bigger than 2048 bytes. If the
description is bigger than that it will throw 400 and the event won't
appear in discord. To fix that, in the createPayload method we now slice
the description to ensure it doesn’t exceed the limit.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This is a X-GitHub Header port
* repository for repository webhooks (matches GitHub)
* organization for organization webhooks (matches GitHub)
* user for user webhooks (Gitea specific)
* system for system webhooks (Gitea specific)
* default for default hooks needs testing (Gitea specific)
- `X-Gitea-Hook-Installation-Target-Type`
- `X-GitHub-Hook-Installation-Target-Type`
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Gitea Actions generated target url doesn't contain host and port. So we
need to include them for external webhook visiting.
Fix#33603
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR created a mock webhook server in the tests and added integration
tests for generic webhooks.
It also fixes bugs in package webhooks and pull request comment
webhooks.
Extract from #33320
This PR uses a map instead of a struct to store webhook event
information. It removes many duplicated functions and makes the logic
clearer.
Resolves#32371.
#31970 should have just showed the commit summary, but
`strings.SplitN()` was misused such that we did not perform any
splitting at all and just used the message. This was not caught in the
unit test made in that PR since the test commit summary was > 50 (which
truncated away the commit description).
This snapshot resolves this and adds another unit test to ensure that we
only show the commit summary.
This PR introduces a new event which is similar as Github's. When a new
commit status submitted, the event will be trigged. That means, now we
can receive all feedback from CI/CD system in webhooks or other notify
systems.
ref:
https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#statusFix#20749
close#25833
Currently, the information for "requested_reviewers" is only included in
the webhook event for reviews. I would like to suggest adding this
information to the webhook event for "PullRequest comment" as well, as
they both pertain to the "PullRequest" event.
Also, The reviewer information for the Pull Request is not displayed
when it is approved or rejected.
Enable [unparam](https://github.com/mvdan/unparam) linter.
Often I could not tell the intention why param is unused, so I put
`//nolint` for those cases like webhook request creation functions never
using `ctx`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.
---
## Current webhook flow
1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request
This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.
Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request
So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.
## Consequences of the refactor
- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)
So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).
Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.
As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.
This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
silverwind
wxiaoguang
Kausthubh J Rao
junoberryferry
ulnanlu
Lunny Xiao
badhezi
Snowball_233
ChristopherHX
Sebastian Weigand
Mopcho
TheFox0x7
Denys Konovalov
Kemal Zebari
谈笑风生间
Jason Song
oliverpool
6543
KN4CK3R
Adam Majer