This chapter covers the Spring Framework's implementation of the Inversion of Control (IoC) See the section entitled principle. The org.springframework.beans and org.springframework.context packages provide the basis for the Spring Framework's IoC container. The BeanFactory interface provides an advanced configuration mechanism capable of managing objects of any nature. The ApplicationContext interface builds on top of the BeanFactory (it is a sub-interface) and adds other functionality such as easier integration with Spring's AOP features, message resource handling (for use in internationalization), event propagation, and application-layer in internationalization), event publication, and application-layer specific contexts such as the WebApplicationContext for use in web applications. In short, the BeanFactory provides the configuration framework and basic functionality, while the ApplicationContext adds more enterprise-centric functionality to it. The ApplicationContext is a complete superset of the BeanFactory, and is used exclusively in this chapter when describing Spring's IoC container. For more information on using the BeanFactory instead of an ApplicationContext refer to the section . This chapter is divided into two parts, with the first part covering Inversion of Control features and the second part covering additional application framework features such as event publication and internationalization.

In Spring, those objects that form the backbone of your application and that are managed by the Spring IoC container are referred to as beans. A bean is simply an object that is instantiated, assembled and otherwise managed by a Spring IoC container; other than that, there is nothing special about a bean (it is in all other respects one of probably many objects in your application). These beans, and the dependencies between them, are reflected in the configuration metadata used by a container. The motivation for using the name 'bean', as opposed to 'component' or 'object' is rooted in the origins of the Spring Framework itself (it arose partly as a response to the complexity of Enterprise JavaBeans).

The interface org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext represents the Spring IoC container and is responsible for instantiating, configuring, and assembling the aforementioned beans. The container gets its instructions on what objects to instantiate, configure and assemble by reading configuration metadata. The configuration metadata can be represented in either XML, Java annotations, or Java code and allows you to express the objects that compose your application and the rich interdependencies between such objects. There are a number of implementations of the ApplicationContext interface that come supplied straight out-of-the-box with Spring. In standalone applications it has traditionally been common to pragmatically create an instance of ClassPathXmlApplicationContext or FileSystemXmlApplicationContext. This is because XML has been the traditional format for defining the configuration metadata. To support the mixing of different configuration metadata formats use the GenericApplicationContext implementation. In the vast majority of application scenarios, explicit user code is not required to instantiate one or more instances of a Spring IoC container. For example, in a web application scenario, a simple eight (or so) lines of boilerplate J2EE web descriptor XML in the web.xml file of the application will typically suffice (see ). The high level view of how the Spring works is shown below. Your application classes are combined with configuration metadata so that once the ApplicationContext is created and initialized you have a fully configured and executable system or application. The Spring IoC container

As can be seen in the above image, the Spring IoC container consumes some form of configuration metadata; this configuration metadata is nothing more than how you (as an application developer) inform the Spring container as to how to instantiate, configure, and assemble [the objects in your application]. This configuration metadata has historically been supplied in a simple and intuitive XML format and so the majority of this chapter will use the XML format to convey key concepts and features of the Spring IoC container. While XML-based metadata has been by far the most commonly used form of configuration metadata. It is not however the only form of configuration metadata that is allowed. The Spring IoC container itself is totally decoupled from the format in which this configuration metadata is actually written. You can find details of other forms of metadata that the Spring container can consume in the following sections Annotation-based configuration: Spring 2.5 introduced support for annotation based configuration metadata. Java-based configuration: Starting with Spring 3.0 many of the features provided by the Spring JavaConfig project have been added to the core Spring Framework. This allows you to define beans external to your application classes using Java rather than XML files. Take a look at the @Configuration, @Bean, @Import and @DependsOn annotations for how to use these new features. Spring configuration consists of at least one bean definition that the container must manage, but typically there will be more than one bean definition. When using XML-based configuration metadata, these beans are configured as <bean/> elements inside a top-level <beans/> element. These bean definitions correspond to the actual objects that make up your application. Typically you will have bean definitions for your service layer objects, your data access objects (DAOs), presentation objects such as Struts Action instances, infrastructure objects such as Hibernate SessionFactories, JMS Queues, and so forth. Typically one does not configure fine-grained domain objects in the container, because it is usually the responsibility of DAOs and business logic to create/load domain objects. However, one can use Spring's integration with AspectJ to configure objects that have been created outside the control of an IoC container. See the section Using AspectJ to dependency inject domain objects with Spring for more information. Find below an example of the basic structure of XML-based configuration metadata. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean id="..." class="..."> <!-- collaborators and configuration for this bean go here --> </bean> <bean id="..." class="..."> <!-- collaborators and configuration for this bean go here --> </bean> <!-- more bean definitions go here --> </beans> The id attribute is a string that you use to identify the individual bean definition. The class attribute defines the type of the bean and uses the fully qualified classname. The value of the id attribute is used as a means to refer to collaborating objects. Note the XML for referring to collaborating objects is not shown in this example, see the section on Dependencies for more information.

Instantiating a Spring IoC container is straightforward. ApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {"services.xml", "daos.xml"}); The location path or paths supplied to an ApplicationContext constructor are actually resource strings that allow the container to load configuration metadata from a variety of external resources such as the local file system, from the Java CLASSPATH, etc. Once you have learned about Spring's IoC container, you may wish to learn a little more about Spring's Resource abstraction, as described in the chapter entitled . The services.xml configuration file is <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <!-- services --> <bean id="petStore" class="org.springframework.samples.jpetstore.services.PetStoreServiceImpl"> <property name="accountDao" ref="accountDao"/> <property name="itemDao" ref="itemDao"/> <!-- additional collaborators and configuration for this bean go here --> </bean> <!-- more bean definitions for services go here --> </beans> and daos.xml is <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean id="accountDao" class="org.springframework.samples.jpetstore.dao.ibatis.SqlMapAccountDao"> <!-- additional collaborators and configuration for this bean go here --> </bean> <bean id="itemDao" class="org.springframework.samples.jpetstore.dao.ibatis.SqlMapItemDao"> <!-- additional collaborators and configuration for this bean go here --> </bean> <!-- more bean definitions for data access objects go here --> </beans> In this example, the service layer consists of the class PetStoreServiceImpl and there are two data access objects of the type SqlMapAccountDao and SqlMapItemDao which are based on the iBatis Object/Relational mapping framework. While the details of configuring an object's dependencies is discussed in the chapter, Dependencies, it is intuitive to see that the property element refers to the name of JavaBean property and the ref element refers to the name of another bean definition. This linkage between id and ref elements expresses the dependency between collaborating objects.

It can often be useful to split up bean definitions into multiple XML files. Often each individual XML configuration file represents a logical layer or module in your architecture. One way to then load an application context which is configured from all these XML fragments is to use the application context constructor which takes multiple Resource locations as was shown in the previous section. An alternate approach is to use one or more occurrences of the <import/> element to load bean definitions from another file (or files). Let's look at a sample: <beans> <import resource="services.xml"/> <import resource="resources/messageSource.xml"/> <import resource="/resources/themeSource.xml"/> <bean id="bean1" class="..."/> <bean id="bean2" class="..."/> </beans> In this example, external bean definitions are being loaded from 3 files, services.xml, messageSource.xml, and themeSource.xml. All location paths are considered relative to the definition file doing the importing, so services.xml in this case must be in the same directory or classpath location as the file doing the importing, while messageSource.xml and themeSource.xml must be in a resources location below the location of the importing file. As you can see, a leading slash is actually ignored, but given that these are considered relative paths, it is probably better form not to use the slash at all. The contents of the files being imported must be valid XML bean definition files according to the Spring Schema or DTD, including the top level <beans/> element. It is possible to reference files in parent directories using a relative "../" path. However, this is not recommended because it creates a dependency on a file that is outside the current application. This is in particular not recommended for "classpath:" URLs (e.g. "classpath:../services.xml") where the runtime resolution process will pick the "nearest" classpath root and then look into its parent directory. This is fragile since classpath configuration changes may lead to a different directory being picked. Note that you can always use fully qualified resource locations instead of relative paths: e.g. "file:C:/config/services.xml" or "classpath:/config/services.xml". However, be aware that you are coupling your application's configuration to specific absolute locations then. It is generally preferable to keep an indirection for such absolute locations, e.g. through "${...}" placeholders that are resolved against JVM system properties at runtime.

An ApplicationContext is essentially nothing more than the interface for an advanced factory capable of maintaining a registry of different beans and their dependencies. Using the method T getBean(Stringname, Class<T> requiredType) you can retrieve instances of your beans; The ApplicationContext enables you to read bean definitions and access them as shown below. // create and configure beans ApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {"services.xml", "daos.xml"}); // retrieve configured instance PetStoreServiceImpl service = context.getBean("petStore", PetStoreServiceImpl.class); // use configured instance List userList service.getUsernameList(); Basically that is all there is to it. Using getBean you can retrieve instances of your beans; the client-side view of the ApplicationContext is simple. The ApplicationContext interface has just a few other methods for retrieving beans, but ideally your application code should never use them... indeed, your application code should have no calls to the getBean method at all, and thus no dependency on Spring APIs at all. For example, Spring's integration with web frameworks provides for dependency injection for various web framework classes such as controllers and JSF-managed beans.

A Spring IoC container manages one or more beans. These beans are created using the configuration metadata that has been supplied to the container (typically in the form of XML <bean/> definitions). Within the container itself, these bean definitions are represented as BeanDefinition objects, which contain (among other information) the following metadata: a package-qualified class name: typically this is the actual implementation class of the bean being defined. bean behavioral configuration elements, which state how the bean should behave in the container (scope, lifecycle callbacks, and so forth). references to other beans which are needed for the bean to do its work; these references are also called collaborators or dependencies. other configuration settings to set in the newly created object. An example would be the number of connections to use in a bean that manages a connection pool, or the size limit of the pool. The concepts listed above directly translate to a set of properties that each bean definition consists of. Some of these properties are listed below, along with a link to further documentation about each of them. Feature Explained in... class name scope constructor arguments properties autowiring mode dependency checking mode lazy-initialization mode initialization method destruction method Besides bean definitions which contain information on how to create a specific bean, certain BeanFactory implementations also permit the registration of existing objects that have been created outside the factory (by user code). The DefaultListableBeanFactory class supports this through the registerSingleton(..) method. (Typical applications solely work with beans defined through metadata bean definitions though.)

The convention (at least amongst the Spring development team) is to use the standard Java convention for instance field names when naming beans. That is, bean names start with a lowercase letter, and are camel-cased from then on. Examples of such names would be (without quotes) 'accountManager', 'accountService', 'userDao', 'loginController', and so forth. Adopting a consistent way of naming your beans will go a long way towards making your configuration easier to read and understand; adopting such naming standards is not hard to do, and if you are using Spring AOP it can pay off handsomely when it comes to applying advice to a set of beans related by name. Every bean has one or more ids (also called identifiers, or names; these terms refer to the same thing). These ids must be unique within the container the bean is hosted in. A bean will almost always have only one id, but if a bean has more than one id, the extra ones can essentially be considered aliases. When using XML-based configuration metadata, you use the 'id' or 'name' attributes to specify the bean identifier(s). The 'id' attribute allows you to specify exactly one id, and as it is a real XML element ID attribute, the XML parser is able to do some extra validation when other elements reference the id; as such, it is the preferred way to specify a bean id. However, the XML specification does limit the characters which are legal in XML IDs. This is usually not a constraint, but if you have a need to use one of these special XML characters, or want to introduce other aliases to the bean, you may also or instead specify one or more bean ids, separated by a comma (,), semicolon (;), or whitespace in the 'name' attribute. Please note that you are not required to supply a name for a bean. If no name is supplied explicitly, the container will generate a unique name for that bean. The motivations for not supplying a name for a bean will be discussed later (one use case is inner beans).

In a bean definition itself, you may supply more than one name for the bean, by using a combination of up to one name specified via the id attribute, and any number of other names via the name attribute. All these names can be considered equivalent aliases to the same bean, and are useful for some situations, such as allowing each component used in an application to refer to a common dependency using a bean name that is specific to that component itself. Having to specify all aliases when the bean is actually defined is not always adequate however. It is sometimes desirable to introduce an alias for a bean which is defined elsewhere. In XML-based configuration metadata this may be accomplished via the use of the <alias/> element. <alias name="fromName" alias="toName"/> In this case, a bean in the same container which is named 'fromName', may also after the use of this alias definition, be referred to as 'toName'. As a concrete example, consider the case where component A defines a DataSource bean called componentA-dataSource, in its XML fragment. Component B would however like to refer to the DataSource as componentB-dataSource in its XML fragment. And the main application, MyApp, defines its own XML fragment and assembles the final application context from all three fragments, and would like to refer to the DataSource as myApp-dataSource. This scenario can be easily handled by adding to the MyApp XML fragment the following standalone aliases: <alias name="componentA-dataSource" alias="componentB-dataSource"/> <alias name="componentA-dataSource" alias="myApp-dataSource" /> Now each component and the main application can refer to the dataSource via a name that is unique and guaranteed not to clash with any other definition (effectively there is a namespace), yet they refer to the same bean.

If for whatever reason you want to configure a bean definition for a static inner class, you have to use the binary name of the inner class. For example, if you have a class called Foo in the com.example package, and this Foo class has a static inner class called Bar, the value of the 'class' attribute on a bean definition would be... com.example.Foo$Bar Notice the use of the $ character in the name to separate the inner class name from the outer class name. A bean definition essentially is a recipe for creating one or more objects. The container looks at the recipe for a named bean when asked, and uses the configuration metadata encapsulated by that bean definition to create (or acquire) an actual object. If you are using XML-based configuration metadata, you can specify the type (or class) of object that is to be instantiated using the 'class' attribute of the <bean/> element. This 'class' attribute (which internally eventually boils down to being a Class property on a BeanDefinition instance) is normally mandatory (see and for the two exceptions) and is used for one of two purposes. The class property specifies the class of the bean to be constructed in the common case where the container itself directly creates the bean by calling its constructor reflectively (somewhat equivalent to Java code using the 'new' operator). In the less common case where the container invokes a static, factory method on a class to create the bean, the class property specifies the actual class containing the static factory method that is to be invoked to create the object (the type of the object returned from the invocation of the static factory method may be the same class or another class entirely, it doesn't matter).

When creating a bean using the constructor approach, all normal classes are usable by and compatible with Spring. That is, the class being created does not need to implement any specific interfaces or be coded in a specific fashion. Just specifying the bean class should be enough. However, depending on what type of IoC you are going to use for that specific bean, you may need a default (empty) constructor. Additionally, the Spring IoC container isn't limited to just managing true JavaBeans, it is also able to manage virtually any class you want it to manage. Most people using Spring prefer to have actual JavaBeans (having just a default (no-argument) constructor and appropriate setters and getters modeled after the properties) in the container, but it is also possible to have more exotic non-bean-style classes in your container. If, for example, you need to use a legacy connection pool that absolutely does not adhere to the JavaBean specification, Spring can manage it as well. When using XML-based configuration metadata you can specify your bean class like so: <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean"/> <bean name="anotherExample" class="examples.ExampleBeanTwo"/> The mechanism for supplying arguments to the constructor (if required), or setting properties of the object instance after it has been constructed, is described shortly.

When defining a bean which is to be created using a static factory method, along with the class attribute which specifies the class containing the static factory method, another attribute named factory-method is needed to specify the name of the factory method itself. Spring expects to be able to call this method (with an optional list of arguments as described later) and get back a live object, which from that point on is treated as if it had been created normally via a constructor. One use for such a bean definition is to call static factories in legacy code. The following example shows a bean definition which specifies that the bean is to be created by calling a factory-method. Note that the definition does not specify the type (class) of the returned object, only the class containing the factory method. In this example, the createInstance() method must be a static method. <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean2" factory-method="createInstance"/> The mechanism for supplying (optional) arguments to the factory method, or setting properties of the object instance after it has been returned from the factory, will be described shortly.

In a fashion similar to instantiation via a static factory method, instantiation using an instance factory method is where a non-static method of an existing bean from the container is invoked to create a new bean. To use this mechanism, the 'class' attribute must be left empty, and the 'factory-bean' attribute must specify the name of a bean in the current (or parent/ancestor) container that contains the instance method that is to be invoked to create the object. The name of the factory method itself must be set using the 'factory-method' attribute. <!-- the factory bean, which contains a method called createInstance() --> <bean id="serviceLocator" class="com.foo.DefaultServiceLocator"> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this locator bean --> </bean> <!-- the bean to be created via the factory bean --> <bean id="exampleBean" factory-bean="serviceLocator" factory-method="createInstance"/> Although the mechanisms for setting bean properties are still to be discussed, one implication of this approach is that the factory bean itself can be managed and configured via DI. When the Spring documentation makes mention of a 'factory bean', this will be a reference to a bean that is configured in the Spring container that will create objects via an instance or static factory method. When the documentation mentions a FactoryBean (notice the capitalization) this is a reference to a Spring-specific FactoryBean .

Your typical enterprise application is not made up of a single object (or bean in the Spring parlance). Even the simplest of applications will no doubt have at least a handful of objects that work together to present what the end-user sees as a coherent application. This next section explains how you go from defining a number of bean definitions that stand-alone, each to themselves, to a fully realized application where objects work (or collaborate) together to achieve some goal (usually an application that does what the end-user wants).

The basic principle behind Dependency Injection (DI) is that objects define their dependencies (that is to say the other objects they work with) only through constructor arguments, arguments to a factory method, or properties which are set on the object instance after it has been constructed or returned from a factory method. Then, it is the job of the container to actually inject those dependencies when it creates the bean. This is fundamentally the inverse, hence the name Inversion of Control (IoC), of the bean itself being in control of instantiating or locating its dependencies on its own using direct construction of classes, or something like the Service Locator pattern. It becomes evident upon usage that code gets much cleaner when the DI principle is applied, and reaching a higher grade of decoupling is much easier when objects do not look up their dependencies, but are provided with them (and additionally do not even know where the dependencies are located and of what concrete class they are). DI exists in two major variants, namely Constructor Injection and Setter Injection.

Constructor-based DI is effected by invoking a constructor with a number of arguments, each representing a dependency. Additionally, calling a static factory method with specific arguments to construct the bean, can be considered almost equivalent, and the rest of this text will consider arguments to a constructor and arguments to a static factory method similarly. Find below an example of a class that could only be dependency injected using constructor injection. Notice that there is nothing special about this class. public class SimpleMovieLister { // the SimpleMovieLister has a dependency on a MovieFinder private MovieFinder movieFinder; // a constructor so that the Spring container can 'inject' a MovieFinder public SimpleMovieLister(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } // business logic that actually 'uses' the injected MovieFinder is omitted... }

Constructor argument resolution matching occurs using the argument's type. If there is no potential for ambiguity in the constructor arguments of a bean definition, then the order in which the constructor arguments are defined in a bean definition is the order in which those arguments will be supplied to the appropriate constructor when it is being instantiated. Consider the following class: package x.y; public class Foo { public Foo(Bar bar, Baz baz) { // ... } } There is no potential for ambiguity here (assuming of course that Bar and Baz classes are not related in an inheritance hierarchy). Thus the following configuration will work just fine, and you do not need to specify the constructor argument indexes and / or types explicitly. <beans> <bean name="foo" class="x.y.Foo"> <constructor-arg> <bean class="x.y.Bar"/> </constructor-arg> <constructor-arg> <bean class="x.y.Baz"/> </constructor-arg> </bean> </beans> When another bean is referenced, the type is known, and matching can occur (as was the case with the preceding example). When a simple type is used, such as <value>true<value>, Spring cannot determine the type of the value, and so cannot match by type without help. Consider the following class: package examples; public class ExampleBean { // No. of years to the calculate the Ultimate Answer private int years; // The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything private String ultimateAnswer; public ExampleBean(int years, String ultimateAnswer) { this.years = years; this.ultimateAnswer = ultimateAnswer; } }

The above scenario can use type matching with simple types by explicitly specifying the type of the constructor argument using the 'type' attribute. For example: <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean"> <constructor-arg type="int" value="7500000"/> <constructor-arg type="java.lang.String" value="42"/> </bean>

Constructor arguments can have their index specified explicitly by use of the index attribute. For example: <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean"> <constructor-arg index="0" value="7500000"/> <constructor-arg index="1" value="42"/> </bean> As well as solving the ambiguity problem of multiple simple values, specifying an index also solves the problem of ambiguity where a constructor may have two arguments of the same type. Note that the index is 0 based.

Setter-based DI is realized by calling setter methods on your beans after invoking a no-argument constructor or no-argument static factory method to instantiate your bean. Find below an example of a class that can only be dependency injected using pure setter injection. Note that there is nothing special about this class... it is plain old Java. public class SimpleMovieLister { // the SimpleMovieLister has a dependency on the MovieFinder private MovieFinder movieFinder; // a setter method so that the Spring container can 'inject' a MovieFinder public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } // business logic that actually 'uses' the injected MovieFinder is omitted... } The Spring team generally advocates the usage of setter injection, since a large number of constructor arguments can get unwieldy, especially when some properties are optional. The presence of setter methods also makes objects of that class amenable to being re-configured (or re-injected) at some later time (for management via JMX MBeans is a particularly compelling use case). Constructor-injection is favored by some purists though (and with good reason). Supplying all of an object's dependencies means that object is never returned to client (calling) code in a less than totally initialized state. The flip side is that the object becomes less amenable to re-configuration (or re-injection). There is no hard and fast rule here. Use whatever type of DI makes the most sense for a particular class; sometimes, when dealing with third party classes to which you do not have the source, the choice will already have been made for you - a legacy class may not expose any setter methods, and so constructor injection will be the only type of DI available to you. The ApplicationContext supports both of these variants for injecting dependencies into beans it manages. (It in fact also supports injecting setter-based dependencies after some dependencies have already been supplied via the constructor approach.) The configuration for the dependencies comes in the form of a BeanDefinition, which is used together with PropertyEditor instances to know how to convert properties from one format to another. However, most users of Spring will not be dealing with these classes directly (that is programmatically), but rather with an XML definition file which will be converted internally into instances of these classes, and used to load an entire Spring IoC container instance. Bean dependency resolution generally happens as follows: The ApplicationContext is created and initialized with a configuration which describes all the beans. (Many Spring users use a an ApplicationContext implementation that supports XML format configuration files but Java code and annotation based configurations are also supported.) Each bean has dependencies expressed in the form of properties, constructor arguments, or arguments to the static-factory method when that is used instead of a normal constructor. These dependencies will be provided to the bean, when the bean is actually created. Each property or constructor argument is either an actual definition of the value to set, or a reference to another bean in the container. Each property or constructor argument which is a value must be able to be converted from whatever format it was specified in, to the actual type of that property or constructor argument. By default Spring can convert a value supplied in string format to all built-in types, such as int, long, String, boolean, etc. The Spring container validates the configuration of each bean as the container is created, including the validation that properties which are bean references are actually referring to valid beans. However, the bean properties themselves are not set until the bean is actually created. For those beans that are singleton-scoped and set to be pre-instantiated (such as singleton beans in an ApplicationContext), creation happens at the time that the container is created, but otherwise this is only when the bean is requested. When a bean actually has to be created, this will potentially cause a graph of other beans to be created, as its dependencies and its dependencies' dependencies (and so on) are created and assigned. If you are using predominantly constructor injection it is possible to write and configure your classes and beans such that an unresolvable circular dependency scenario is created. Consider the scenario where you have class A, which requires an instance of class B to be provided via constructor injection, and class B, which requires an instance of class A to be provided via constructor injection. If you configure beans for classes A and B to be injected into each other, the Spring IoC container will detect this circular reference at runtime, and throw a BeanCurrentlyInCreationException. One possible solution to this issue is to edit the source code of some of your classes to be configured via setters instead of via constructors. Another solution is not to use constructor injection and stick to setter injection only. In other words, while it should generally be avoided in all but the rarest of circumstances, it is possible to configure circular dependencies with setter injection. Unlike the typical case (with no circular dependencies), a circular dependency between bean A and bean B will force one of the beans to be injected into the other prior to being fully initialized itself (a classic chicken/egg scenario). You can generally trust Spring to do the right thing. It will detect misconfiguration issues, such as references to non-existent beans and circular dependencies, at container load-time. It will actually set properties and resolve dependencies as late as possible, which is when the bean is actually created. This means that a Spring container which has loaded correctly can later generate an exception when you request a bean if there is a problem creating that bean or one of its dependencies. This could happen if the bean throws an exception as a result of a missing or invalid property, for example. This potentially delayed visibility of some configuration issues is why ApplicationContext implementations by default pre-instantiate singleton beans. At the cost of some upfront time and memory to create these beans before they are actually needed, you find out about configuration issues when the ApplicationContext is created, not later. If you wish, you can still override this default behavior and set any of these singleton beans to lazy-initialize (that is not be pre-instantiated). If no circular dependencies are involved (see sidebar for a discussion of circular dependencies), when one or more collaborating beans are being injected into a dependent bean, each collaborating bean is totally configured prior to being passed (via one of the DI flavors) to the dependent bean. This means that if bean A has a dependency on bean B, the Spring IoC container will totally configure bean B prior to invoking the setter method on bean A; you can read 'totally configure' to mean that the bean will be instantiated (if not a pre-instantiated singleton), all of its dependencies will be set, and the relevant lifecycle methods (such as a configured init method or the IntializingBean callback method) will all be invoked.

First, an example of using XML-based configuration metadata for setter-based DI. Find below a small part of a Spring XML configuration file specifying some bean definitions. <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean"> <!-- setter injection using the nested <ref/> element --> <property name="beanOne"><ref bean="anotherExampleBean"/></property> <!-- setter injection using the neater 'ref' attribute --> <property name="beanTwo" ref="yetAnotherBean"/> <property name="integerProperty" value="1"/> </bean> <bean id="anotherExampleBean" class="examples.AnotherBean"/> <bean id="yetAnotherBean" class="examples.YetAnotherBean"/> public class ExampleBean { private AnotherBean beanOne; private YetAnotherBean beanTwo; private int i; public void setBeanOne(AnotherBean beanOne) { this.beanOne = beanOne; } public void setBeanTwo(YetAnotherBean beanTwo) { this.beanTwo = beanTwo; } public void setIntegerProperty(int i) { this.i = i; } } As you can see, setters have been declared to match against the properties specified in the XML file. Find below an example of using constructor-based DI. <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean"> <!-- constructor injection using the nested <ref/> element --> <constructor-arg> <ref bean="anotherExampleBean"/> </constructor-arg> <!-- constructor injection using the neater 'ref' attribute --> <constructor-arg ref="yetAnotherBean"/> <constructor-arg type="int" value="1"/> </bean> <bean id="anotherExampleBean" class="examples.AnotherBean"/> <bean id="yetAnotherBean" class="examples.YetAnotherBean"/> public class ExampleBean { private AnotherBean beanOne; private YetAnotherBean beanTwo; private int i; public ExampleBean( AnotherBean anotherBean, YetAnotherBean yetAnotherBean, int i) { this.beanOne = anotherBean; this.beanTwo = yetAnotherBean; this.i = i; } } As you can see, the constructor arguments specified in the bean definition will be used to pass in as arguments to the constructor of the ExampleBean. Now consider a variant of this where instead of using a constructor, Spring is told to call a static factory method to return an instance of the object: <bean id="exampleBean" class="examples.ExampleBean" factory-method="createInstance"> <constructor-arg ref="anotherExampleBean"/> <constructor-arg ref="yetAnotherBean"/> <constructor-arg value="1"/> </bean> <bean id="anotherExampleBean" class="examples.AnotherBean"/> <bean id="yetAnotherBean" class="examples.YetAnotherBean"/> public class ExampleBean { // a private constructor private ExampleBean(...) { ... } // a static factory method; the arguments to this method can be // considered the dependencies of the bean that is returned, // regardless of how those arguments are actually used. public static ExampleBean createInstance ( AnotherBean anotherBean, YetAnotherBean yetAnotherBean, int i) { ExampleBean eb = new ExampleBean (...); // some other operations... return eb; } } Note that arguments to the static factory method are supplied via <constructor-arg/> elements, exactly the same as if a constructor had actually been used. Also, it is important to realize that the type of the class being returned by the factory method does not have to be of the same type as the class which contains the static factory method, although in this example it is. An instance (non-static) factory method would be used in an essentially identical fashion (aside from the use of the factory-bean attribute instead of the class attribute), so details will not be discussed here.

As mentioned in the previous section, bean properties and constructor arguments can be defined as either references to other managed beans (collaborators), or values defined inline. Spring's XML-based configuration metadata supports a number of sub-element types within its <property/> and <constructor-arg/> elements for just this purpose.

The <value/> element specifies a property or constructor argument as a human-readable string representation. As mentioned previously, JavaBeans PropertyEditors are used to convert these string values from a String to the actual type of the property or argument. <bean id="myDataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close"> <!-- results in a setDriverClassName(String) call --> <property name="driverClassName"> <value>com.mysql.jdbc.Driver</value> </property> <property name="url"> <value>jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb</value> </property> <property name="username"> <value>root</value> </property> <property name="password"> <value>masterkaoli</value> </property> </bean> The <property/> and <constructor-arg/> elements also support the use of the 'value' attribute, which can lead to much more succinct configuration. When using the 'value' attribute, the above bean definition reads like so: <bean id="myDataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close"> <!-- results in a setDriverClassName(String) call --> <property name="driverClassName" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"/> <property name="url" value="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb"/> <property name="username" value="root"/> <property name="password" value="masterkaoli"/> </bean> The Spring team generally prefer the attribute style over the use of nested <value/> elements. If you are reading this reference manual straight through from top to bottom (wow!) then we are getting slightly ahead of ourselves here, but you can also configure a java.util.Properties instance like so: <bean id="mappings" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> <!-- typed as a java.util.Properties --> <property name="properties"> <value> jdbc.driver.className=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver jdbc.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb </value> </property> </bean> Can you see what is happening? The Spring container is converting the text inside the <value/> element into a java.util.Properties instance using the JavaBeans PropertyEditor mechanism. This is a nice shortcut, and is one of a few places where the Spring team do favor the use of the nested <value/> element over the 'value' attribute style.

The idref element is simply an error-proof way to pass the id of another bean in the container (to a <constructor-arg/> or <property/> element). <bean id="theTargetBean" class="..."/> <bean id="theClientBean" class="..."> <property name="targetName"> <idref bean="theTargetBean" /> </property> </bean> The above bean definition snippet is exactly equivalent (at runtime) to the following snippet: <bean id="theTargetBean" class="..." /> <bean id="client" class="..."> <property name="targetName" value="theTargetBean" /> </bean> The main reason the first form is preferable to the second is that using the idref tag allows the container to validate at deployment time that the referenced, named bean actually exists. In the second variation, no validation is performed on the value that is passed to the 'targetName' property of the 'client' bean. Any typo will only be discovered (with most likely fatal results) when the 'client' bean is actually instantiated. If the 'client' bean is a prototype bean, this typo (and the resulting exception) may only be discovered long after the container is actually deployed. Additionally, if the bean being referred to is in the same XML unit, and the bean name is the bean id, the 'local' attribute may be used, which allows the XML parser itself to validate the bean id even earlier, at XML document parse time. <property name="targetName"> <!-- a bean with an id of 'theTargetBean' must exist; otherwise an XML exception will be thrown --> <idref local="theTargetBean"/> </property> By way of an example, one common place (at least in pre-Spring 2.0 configuration) where the <idref/> element brings value is in the configuration of AOP interceptors in a ProxyFactoryBean bean definition. If you use <idref/> elements when specifying the interceptor names, there is no chance of inadvertently misspelling an interceptor id.

The ref element is the final element allowed inside a <constructor-arg/> or <property/> definition element. It is used to set the value of the specified property to be a reference to another bean managed by the container (a collaborator). As mentioned in a previous section, the referred-to bean is considered to be a dependency of the bean who's property is being set, and will be initialized on demand as needed (if it is a singleton bean it may have already been initialized by the container) before the property is set. All references are ultimately just a reference to another object, but there are 3 variations on how the id/name of the other object may be specified, which determines how scoping and validation is handled. Specifying the target bean by using the bean attribute of the <ref/> tag is the most general form, and will allow creating a reference to any bean in the same container (whether or not in the same XML file), or parent container. The value of the 'bean' attribute may be the same as either the 'id' attribute of the target bean, or one of the values in the 'name' attribute of the target bean. <ref bean="someBean"/> Specifying the target bean by using the local attribute leverages the ability of the XML parser to validate XML id references within the same file. The value of the local attribute must be the same as the id attribute of the target bean. The XML parser will issue an error if no matching element is found in the same file. As such, using the local variant is the best choice (in order to know about errors as early as possible) if the target bean is in the same XML file. <ref local="someBean"/> Specifying the target bean by using the 'parent' attribute allows a reference to be created to a bean which is in a parent container of the current container. The value of the 'parent' attribute may be the same as either the 'id' attribute of the target bean, or one of the values in the 'name' attribute of the target bean, and the target bean must be in a parent container to the current one. The main use of this bean reference variant is when you have a hierarchy of containers and you want to wrap an existing bean in a parent container with some sort of proxy which will have the same name as the parent bean. <!-- in the parent context --> <bean id="accountService" class="com.foo.SimpleAccountService"> <!-- insert dependencies as required as here --> </bean> <!-- in the child (descendant) context --> <bean id="accountService" <-- notice that the name of this bean is the same as the name of the 'parent' bean class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="target"> <ref parent="accountService"/> <-- notice how we refer to the parent bean </property> <!-- insert other configuration and dependencies as required as here --> </bean>

A <bean/> element inside the <property/> or <constructor-arg/> elements is used to define a so-called inner bean. An inner bean definition does not need to have any id or name defined, and it is best not to even specify any id or name value because the id or name value simply will be ignored by the container. <bean id="outer" class="..."> <!-- instead of using a reference to a target bean, simply define the target bean inline --> <property name="target"> <bean class="com.example.Person"> <!-- this is the inner bean --> <property name="name" value="Fiona Apple"/> <property name="age" value="25"/> </bean> </property> </bean> Note that in the specific case of inner beans, the 'scope' flag and any 'id' or 'name' attribute are effectively ignored. Inner beans are always anonymous and they are always scoped as prototypes. Please also note that it is not possible to inject inner beans into collaborating beans other than the enclosing bean.

The <list/>, <set/>, <map/>, and <props/> elements allow properties and arguments of the Java Collection type List, Set, Map, and Properties, respectively, to be defined and set. <bean id="moreComplexObject" class="example.ComplexObject"> <!-- results in a setAdminEmails(java.util.Properties) call --> <property name="adminEmails"> <props> <prop key="administrator">administrator@example.org</prop> <prop key="support">support@example.org</prop> <prop key="development">development@example.org</prop> </props> </property> <!-- results in a setSomeList(java.util.List) call --> <property name="someList"> <list> <value>a list element followed by a reference</value> <ref bean="myDataSource" /> </list> </property> <!-- results in a setSomeMap(java.util.Map) call --> <property name="someMap"> <map> <entry> <key> <value>an entry</value> </key> <value>just some string</value> </entry> <entry> <key> <value>a ref</value> </key> <ref bean="myDataSource" /> </entry> </map> </property> <!-- results in a setSomeSet(java.util.Set) call --> <property name="someSet"> <set> <value>just some string</value> <ref bean="myDataSource" /> </set> </property> </bean> The nested element style used this initial example tends to become quite verbose. Fortunately, there are attribute shortcuts for most elements, which you can read about in . Note that the value of a map key or value, or a set value, can also again be any of the following elements: bean | ref | idref | list | set | map | props | value | null

As of Spring 2.0, the container also supports the merging of collections. This allows an application developer to define a parent-style <list/>, <map/>, <set/> or <props/> element, and have child-style <list/>, <map/>, <set/> or <props/> elements inherit and override values from the parent collection; that is to say the child collection's values will be the result obtained from the merging of the elements of the parent and child collections, with the child's collection elements overriding values specified in the parent collection. Please note that this section on merging makes use of the parent-child bean mechanism. This concept has not yet been introduced, so readers unfamiliar with the concept of parent and child bean definitions may wish to read the relevant section before continuing. Find below an example of the collection merging feature: <beans> <bean id="parent" abstract="true" class="example.ComplexObject"> <property name="adminEmails"> <props> <prop key="administrator">administrator@example.com</prop> <prop key="support">support@example.com</prop> </props> </property> </bean> <bean id="child" parent="parent"> <property name="adminEmails"> <!-- the merge is specified on the *child* collection definition --> <props merge="true"> <prop key="sales">sales@example.com</prop> <prop key="support">support@example.co.uk</prop> </props> </property> </bean> <beans> Notice the use of the merge=true attribute on the <props/> element of the adminEmails property of the child bean definition. When the child bean is actually resolved and instantiated by the container, the resulting instance will have an adminEmails Properties collection that contains the result of the merging of the child's adminEmails collection with the parent's adminEmails collection. administrator=administrator@example.com sales=sales@example.com support=support@example.co.uk Notice how the child Properties collection's value set will have inherited all the property elements from the parent <props/>. Notice also how the child's value for the support value overrides the value in the parent collection. This merging behavior applies similarly to the <list/>, <map/>, and <set/> collection types. In the specific case of the <list/> element, the semantics associated with the List collection type, that is the notion of an ordered collection of values, is maintained; the parent's values will precede all of the child list's values. In the case of the Map, Set, and Properties collection types, there is no notion of ordering and hence no ordering semantics are in effect for the collection types that underlie the associated Map, Set and Properties implementation types used internally by the container. Finally, some minor notes about the merging support are in order; you cannot merge different collection types (e.g. a Map and a List), and if you do attempt to do so an appropriate Exception will be thrown; and in case it is not immediately obvious, the 'merge' attribute must be specified on the lower level, inherited, child definition; specifying the 'merge' attribute on a parent collection definition is redundant and will not result in the desired merging; and (lastly), please note that this merging feature is only available in Spring 2.0 (and later versions).

If you are using Java 5 or Java 6, you will be aware that it is possible to have strongly typed collections (using generic types). That is, it is possible to declare a Collection type such that it can only contain String elements (for example). If you are using Spring to dependency inject a strongly-typed Collection into a bean, you can take advantage of Spring's type-conversion support such that the elements of your strongly-typed Collection instances will be converted to the appropriate type prior to being added to the Collection. public class Foo { private Map<String, Float> accounts; public void setAccounts(Map<String, Float> accounts) { this.accounts = accounts; } } <beans> <bean id="foo" class="x.y.Foo"> <property name="accounts"> <map> <entry key="one" value="9.99"/> <entry key="two" value="2.75"/> <entry key="six" value="3.99"/> </map> </property> </bean> </beans> When the 'accounts' property of the 'foo' bean is being prepared for injection, the generics information about the element type of the strongly-typed Map<String, Float> is actually available via reflection, and so Spring's type conversion infrastructure will actually recognize the various value elements as being of type Float and so the string values '9.99', '2.75', and '3.99' will be converted into an actual Float type.

The <null/> element is used to handle null values. Spring treats empty arguments for properties and the like as empty Strings. The following XML-based configuration metadata snippet results in the email property being set to the empty String value ("") <bean class="ExampleBean"> <property name="email"><value/></property> </bean> This is equivalent to the following Java code: exampleBean.setEmail(""). The special <null> element may be used to indicate a null value. For example: <bean class="ExampleBean"> <property name="email"><null/></property> </bean> The above configuration is equivalent to the following Java code: exampleBean.setEmail(null).

The configuration metadata shown so far is a tad verbose. That is why there are several options available for you to limit the amount of XML you have to write to configure your components. The first is a shortcut to define values and references to other beans as part of a <property/> definition. The second is slightly different format of specifying properties altogether.

The <property/>, <constructor-arg/>, and <entry/> elements all support a 'value' attribute which may be used instead of embedding a full <value/> element. Therefore, the following: <property name="myProperty"> <value>hello</value> </property> <constructor-arg> <value>hello</value> </constructor-arg> <entry key="myKey"> <value>hello</value> </entry> are equivalent to: <property name="myProperty" value="hello"/> <constructor-arg value="hello"/> <entry key="myKey" value="hello"/> The <property/> and <constructor-arg/> elements support a similar shortcut 'ref' attribute which may be used instead of a full nested <ref/> element. Therefore, the following: <property name="myProperty"> <ref bean="myBean"> </property> <constructor-arg> <ref bean="myBean"> </constructor-arg> ... are equivalent to: <property name="myProperty" ref="myBean"/> <constructor-arg ref="myBean"/> Note however that the shortcut form is equivalent to a <ref bean="xxx"> element; there is no shortcut for <ref local="xxx">. To enforce a strict local reference, you must use the long form. Finally, the entry element allows a shortcut form to specify the key and/or value of the map, in the form of the 'key' / 'key-ref' and 'value' / 'value-ref' attributes. Therefore, the following: <entry> <key> <ref bean="myKeyBean" /> </key> <ref bean="myValueBean" /> </entry> is equivalent to: <entry key-ref="myKeyBean" value-ref="myValueBean"/> Again, the shortcut form is equivalent to a <ref bean="xxx"> element; there is no shortcut for <ref local="xxx">.

The second option you have to limit the amount of XML you have to write to configure your components is to use the special "p-namespace". Spring 2.0 and later features support for extensible configuration formats using namespaces. Those namespaces are all based on an XML Schema definition. In fact, the beans configuration format that you've been reading about is defined in an XML Schema document. One special namespace is not defined in an XSD file, and only exists in the core of Spring itself. The so-called p-namespace doesn't need a schema definition and is an alternative way of configuring your properties differently than the way you have seen so far. Instead of using nested <property/> elements, using the p-namespace you can use attributes as part of the bean element that describe your property values. The values of the attributes will be taken as the values for your properties. The following two XML snippets boil down to the same thing in the end: the first is using the standard XML format whereas the second example is using the p-namespace. <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:p="http://www.springframework.org/schema/p" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean name="classic" class="com.example.ExampleBean"> <property name="email" value="foo@bar.com"/> </bean> <bean name="p-namespace" class="com.example.ExampleBean" p:email="foo@bar.com"/> </beans> As you can see, we are including an attribute in the p-namespace called email in the bean definition - this is telling Spring that it should include a property declaration. As previously mentioned, the p-namespace doesn't have a schema definition, so the name of the attribute can be set to whatever name your property has. This next example includes two more bean definitions that both have a reference to another bean: <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:p="http://www.springframework.org/schema/p" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean name="john-classic" class="com.example.Person"> <property name="name" value="John Doe"/> <property name="spouse" ref="jane"/> </bean> <bean name="john-modern" class="com.example.Person" p:name="John Doe" p:spouse-ref="jane"/> <bean name="jane" class="com.example.Person"> <property name="name" value="Jane Doe"/> </bean> </beans> As you can see, this example doesn't only include a property value using the p-namespace, but also uses a special format to declare property references. Whereas the first bean definition uses <property name="spouse" ref="jane"/> to create a reference from bean john to bean jane, the second bean definition uses p:spouse-ref="jane" as an attribute to do the exact same thing. In this case 'spouse' is the property name whereas the '-ref' part indicates that this is not a straight value but rather a reference to another bean. Please note that the p-namespace is not quite as flexible as the standard XML format - for example particular, the 'special' format used to declare property references will clash with properties that end in 'Ref', whereas the standard XML format would have no problem there. We recommend that you choose carefully which approach you are going to use in your projects. You should also communicate this to your team members so you won't end up with XML documents using all three approaches at the same time. This will prevent people from not understanding the application because of different ways of configuring it, and will add to the overall consistency of your codebase.

Compound or nested property names are perfectly legal when setting bean properties, as long as all components of the path except the final property name are not null. Consider the following bean definition... <bean id="foo" class="foo.Bar"> <property name="fred.bob.sammy" value="123" /> </bean> The foo bean has a fred property which has a bob property, which has a sammy property, and that final sammy property is being set to the value 123. In order for this to work, the fred property of foo, and the bob property of fred must not be null be non-null after the bean is constructed, or a NullPointerException will be thrown.

For most situations, the fact that a bean is a dependency of another is expressed by the fact that one bean is set as a property of another. This is typically accomplished with the <ref/> element in XML-based configuration metadata. For the relatively infrequent situations where dependencies between beans are less direct (for example, when a static initializer in a class needs to be triggered, such as database driver registration), the 'depends-on' attribute may be used to explicitly force one or more beans to be initialized before the bean using this element is initialized. Find below an example of using the 'depends-on' attribute to express a dependency on a single bean. <bean id="beanOne" class="ExampleBean" depends-on="manager"/> <bean id="manager" class="ManagerBean" /> If you need to express a dependency on multiple beans, you can supply a list of bean names as the value of the 'depends-on' attribute, with commas, whitespace and semicolons all valid delimiters, like so: <bean id="beanOne" class="ExampleBean" depends-on="manager,accountDao"> <property name="manager" ref="manager" /> </bean> <bean id="manager" class="ManagerBean" /> <bean id="accountDao" class="x.y.jdbc.JdbcAccountDao" /> The 'depends-on' attribute at the bean definition level is used not only to specify an initialization time dependency, but also to specify the corresponding destroy time dependency (in the case of singleton beans only). Dependent beans that define a 'depends-on' relationship with a given bean will be destroyed first - prior to the given bean itself being destroyed. As a consequence, 'depends-on' may be used to control shutdown order too.

The default behavior for ApplicationContext implementations is to eagerly pre-instantiate all singleton beans at startup. Pre-instantiation means that an ApplicationContext will eagerly create and configure all of its singleton beans as part of its initialization process. Generally this is a good thing, because it means that any errors in the configuration or in the surrounding environment will be discovered immediately (as opposed to possibly hours or even days down the line). However, there are times when this behavior is not what is wanted. If you do not want a singleton bean to be pre-instantiated when using an ApplicationContext, you can selectively control this by marking a bean definition as lazy-initialized. A lazily-initialized bean indicates to the IoC container whether or not a bean instance should be created at startup or when it is first requested. When configuring beans via XML, this lazy loading is controlled by the 'lazy-init' attribute on the <bean/> element; for example: <bean id="lazy" class="com.foo.ExpensiveToCreateBean" lazy-init="true"/> <bean name="not.lazy" class="com.foo.AnotherBean"/> When the above configuration is consumed by an ApplicationContext, the bean named 'lazy' will not be eagerly pre-instantiated when the ApplicationContext is starting up, whereas the 'not.lazy' bean will be eagerly pre-instantiated. One thing to understand about lazy-initialization is that even though a bean definition may be marked up as being lazy-initialized, if the lazy-initialized bean is the dependency of a singleton bean that is not lazy-initialized, when the ApplicationContext is eagerly pre-instantiating the singleton, it will have to satisfy all of the singletons dependencies, one of which will be the lazy-initialized bean! So don't be confused if the IoC container creates one of the beans that you have explicitly configured as lazy-initialized at startup; all that means is that the lazy-initialized bean is being injected into a non-lazy-initialized singleton bean elsewhere. It is also possible to control lazy-initialization at the container level by using the 'default-lazy-init' attribute on the <beans/> element; for example: <beans default-lazy-init="true"> <!-- no beans will be pre-instantiated... --> </beans>

The Spring container is able to autowire relationships between collaborating beans. This means that it is possible to automatically let Spring resolve collaborators (other beans) for your bean by inspecting the contents of the ApplicationContext. The autowiring functionality has five modes. Autowiring is specified per bean and can thus be enabled for some beans, while other beans will not be autowired. Using autowiring, it is possible to reduce or eliminate the need to specify properties or constructor arguments, thus saving a significant amount of typing. See the section entitled When using XML-based configuration metadata, the autowire mode for a bean definition is specified by using the autowire attribute of the <bean/> element. The following values are allowed: Mode Explanation no No autowiring at all. Bean references must be defined via a ref element. This is the default, and changing this is discouraged for larger deployments, since explicitly specifying collaborators gives greater control and clarity. To some extent, it is a form of documentation about the structure of a system. byName Autowiring by property name. This option will inspect the container and look for a bean named exactly the same as the property which needs to be autowired. For example, if you have a bean definition which is set to autowire by name, and it contains a master property (that is, it has a setMaster(..) method), Spring will look for a bean definition named master, and use it to set the property. byType Allows a property to be autowired if there is exactly one bean of the property type in the container. If there is more than one, a fatal exception is thrown, and this indicates that you may not use byType autowiring for that bean. If there are no matching beans, nothing happens; the property is not set. If this is not desirable, setting the dependency-check="objects" attribute value specifies that an error should be thrown in this case. constructor This is analogous to byType, but applies to constructor arguments. If there isn't exactly one bean of the constructor argument type in the container, a fatal error is raised. autodetect Chooses constructor or byType through introspection of the bean class. If a default constructor is found, the byType mode will be applied. Note that explicit dependencies in property and constructor-arg settings always override autowiring. Please also note that it is not currently possible to autowire so-called simple properties such as primitives, Strings, and Classes (and arrays of such simple properties). (This is by-design and should be considered a feature.) When using either the byType or constructor autowiring mode, it is possible to wire arrays and typed-collections. In such cases all autowire candidates within the container that match the expected type will be provided to satisfy the dependency. Strongly-typed Maps can even be autowired if the expected key type is String. An autowired Map's values will consist of all bean instances that match the expected type, and the Map's keys will contain the corresponding bean names. Autowire behavior can be combined with dependency checking, which will be performed after all autowiring has been completed. It is important to understand the various advantages and disadvantages of autowiring. Some advantages of autowiring include: Autowiring can significantly reduce the volume of configuration required. However, mechanisms such as the use of a bean template (discussed elsewhere in this chapter) are also valuable in this regard. Autowiring can cause configuration to keep itself up to date as your objects evolve. For example, if you need to add an additional dependency to a class, that dependency can be satisfied automatically without the need to modify configuration. Thus there may be a strong case for autowiring during development, without ruling out the option of switching to explicit wiring when the code base becomes more stable. Some disadvantages of autowiring: Autowiring is more magical than explicit wiring. Although, as noted in the above table, Spring is careful to avoid guessing in case of ambiguity which might have unexpected results, the relationships between your Spring-managed objects are no longer documented explicitly. Wiring information may not be available to tools that may generate documentation from a Spring container. Another issue to consider when autowiring by type is that multiple bean definitions within the container may match the type specified by the setter method or constructor argument to be autowired. For arrays, collections, or Maps, this is not necessarily a problem. However for dependencies that expect a single value, this ambiguity will not be arbitrarily resolved. Instead, if no unique bean definition is available, an Exception will be thrown. You do have several options when confronted with this scenario. First, you may abandon autowiring in favor of explicit wiring. Second, you may designate that certain bean definitions are never to be considered as candidates by setting their 'autowire-candidate' attributes to 'false' as described in the next section. Third, you may designate a single bean definition as the primary candidate by setting the 'primary' attribute of its <bean/> element to 'true'. Finally, if you are using at least Java 5, you may be interested in exploring the more fine-grained control available with annotation-based configuration as described in the section entitled . When deciding whether to use autowiring, there is no wrong or right answer in all cases. A degree of consistency across a project is best though; for example, if autowiring is not used in general, it might be confusing to developers to use it just to wire one or two bean definitions.

You can also (on a per-bean basis) totally exclude a bean from being an autowire candidate. When configuring beans using Spring's XML format, the 'autowire-candidate' attribute of the <bean/> element can be set to 'false'; this has the effect of making the container totally exclude that specific bean definition from being available to the autowiring infrastructure. Another option is to limit autowire candidates based on pattern-matching against bean names. The top-level <beans/> element accepts one or more patterns within its 'default-autowire-candidates' attribute. For example, to limit autowire candidate status to any bean whose name ends with 'Repository', provide a value of '*Repository'. To provide multiple patterns, define them in a comma-separated list. Note that an explicit value of 'true' or 'false' for a bean definition's 'autowire-candidate' attribute always takes precedence, and for such beans, the pattern matching rules will not apply. These techniques can be useful when you have one or more beans that you absolutely never ever want to have injected into other beans via autowiring. It does not mean that an excluded bean cannot itself be configured using autowiring... it can, it is rather that it itself will not be considered as a candidate for autowiring other beans.

The Spring IoC container also has the ability to check for the existence of unresolved dependencies of a bean deployed into the container. These are JavaBeans properties of the bean, which do not have actual values set for them in the bean definition, or alternately provided automatically by the autowiring feature. This feature is sometimes useful when you want to ensure that all properties (or all properties of a certain type) are set on a bean. Of course, in many cases a bean class will have default values for many properties, or some properties do not apply to all usage scenarios, so this feature is of limited use. Dependency checking can also be enabled and disabled per bean, just as with the autowiring functionality. The default is to not check dependencies. Dependency checking can be handled in several different modes. When using XML-based configuration metadata, this is specified via the 'dependency-check' attribute in a bean definition, which may have the following values. Mode Explanation none No dependency checking. Properties of the bean which have no value specified for them are simply not set. simple Dependency checking is performed for primitive types and collections (everything except collaborators). object Dependency checking is performed for collaborators only. all Dependency checking is done for collaborators, primitive types and collections. If you are using Java 5 and thus have access to source-level annotations, you may find the section entitled to be of interest.

For most application scenarios, the majority of the beans in the container will be singletons. When a singleton bean needs to collaborate with another singleton bean, or a non-singleton bean needs to collaborate with another non-singleton bean, the typical and common approach of handling this dependency by defining one bean to be a property of the other is quite adequate. There is a problem when the bean lifecycles are different. Consider a singleton bean A which needs to use a non-singleton (prototype) bean B, perhaps on each method invocation on A. The container will only create the singleton bean A once, and thus only get the opportunity to set the properties once. There is no opportunity for the container to provide bean A with a new instance of bean B every time one is needed. One solution to this issue is to forego some inversion of control. Bean A can be made aware of the container by implementing the ApplicationContextFactoryAware interface, and use programmatic means to ask the container via a getBean("B") call for (a typically new) bean B instance every time it needs it. Find below an admittedly somewhat contrived example of this approach: // a class that uses a stateful Command-style class to perform some processing package fiona.apple; // Spring-API imports import org.springframework.beans.BeansException; import org.springframework.context.Applicationcontext; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextAware; public class CommandManager implements ApplicationContextAware { private ApplicationContext applicationContext; public Object process(Map commandState) { // grab a new instance of the appropriate Command Command command = createCommand(); // set the state on the (hopefully brand new) Command instance command.setState(commandState); return command.execute(); } // the Command returned here could be an implementation that executes asynchronously, or whatever protected Command createCommand() { return this.applicationContext.getBean("command", Command.class); // notice the Spring API dependency } public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException { this.applicationContext = applicationContext; } } The above example is generally not a desirable solution since the business code is then aware of and coupled to the Spring Framework. Method Injection, a somewhat advanced feature of the Spring IoC container, allows this use case to be handled in a clean fashion.

... somewhat like Tapestry 4.0's pages, where folks wrote abstract properties that Tapestry would override at runtime with implementations that did stuff? It sure is (well, somewhat). You can read more about the motivation for Method Injection in this blog entry. Lookup method injection refers to the ability of the container to override methods on container managed beans, to return the result of looking up another named bean in the container. The lookup will typically be of a prototype bean as in the scenario described above. The Spring Framework implements this method injection by dynamically generating a subclass overriding the method, using bytecode generation via the CGLIB library. So if you look at the code from previous code snippet (the CommandManager class), the Spring container is going to dynamically override the implementation of the createCommand() method. Your CommandManager class is not going to have any Spring dependencies, as can be seen in this reworked example below: package fiona.apple; // no more Spring imports! public abstract class CommandManager { public Object process(Object commandState) { // grab a new instance of the appropriate Command interface Command command = createCommand(); // set the state on the (hopefully brand new) Command instance command.setState(commandState); return command.execute(); } // okay... but where is the implementation of this method? protected abstract Command createCommand(); } In the client class containing the method to be injected (the CommandManager in this case), the method that is to be 'injected' must have a signature of the following form: <public|protected> [abstract] <return-type> theMethodName(no-arguments); If the method is abstract, the dynamically-generated subclass will implement the method. Otherwise, the dynamically-generated subclass will override the concrete method defined in the original class. Let's look at an example: <!-- a stateful bean deployed as a prototype (non-singleton) --> <bean id="command" class="fiona.apple.AsyncCommand" scope="prototype"> <!-- inject dependencies here as required --> </bean> <!-- commandProcessor uses statefulCommandHelper --> <bean id="commandManager" class="fiona.apple.CommandManager"> <lookup-method name="createCommand" bean="command"/> </bean> The bean identified as commandManager will call its own method createCommand() whenever it needs a new instance of the command bean. It is important to note that the person deploying the beans must be careful to deploy the command bean as a prototype (if that is actually what is needed). If it is deployed as a singleton, the same instance of the command bean will be returned each time! Please be aware that in order for this dynamic subclassing to work, you will need to have the CGLIB jar(s) on your classpath. Additionally, the class that the Spring container is going to subclass cannot be final, and the method that is being overridden cannot be final either. Also, testing a class that has an abstract method can be somewhat odd in that you will have to subclass the class yourself and supply a stub implementation of the abstract method. Finally, objects that have been the target of method injection cannot be serialized. The interested reader may also find the ServiceLocatorFactoryBean (in the org.springframework.beans.factory.config package) to be of use. The approach used in ServiceLocatorFactoryBean is similar to that of another utility class, ObjectFactoryCreatingFactoryBean, but it allows you to specify your own lookup interface as opposed to having to use a Spring-specific lookup interface. Consult the JavaDocs for these classes as well as this blog entry for a additional information ServiceLocatorFactoryBean.

A less commonly useful form of method injection than Lookup Method Injection is the ability to replace arbitrary methods in a managed bean with another method implementation. Users may safely skip the rest of this section (which describes this somewhat advanced feature), until this functionality is actually needed. When using XML-based configuration metadata, the replaced-method element may be used to replace an existing method implementation with another, for a deployed bean. Consider the following class, with a method computeValue, which we want to override: public class MyValueCalculator { public String computeValue(String input) { // some real code... } // some other methods... } A class implementing the org.springframework.beans.factory.support.MethodReplacer interface provides the new method definition. /** meant to be used to override the existing computeValue(String) implementation in MyValueCalculator */ public class ReplacementComputeValue implements MethodReplacer { public Object reimplement(Object o, Method m, Object[] args) throws Throwable { // get the input value, work with it, and return a computed result String input = (String) args[0]; ... return ...; } } The bean definition to deploy the original class and specify the method override would look like this: <bean id="myValueCalculator" class="x.y.z.MyValueCalculator"> <!-- arbitrary method replacement --> <replaced-method name="computeValue" replacer="replacementComputeValue"> <arg-type>String</arg-type> </replaced-method> </bean> <bean id="replacementComputeValue" class="a.b.c.ReplacementComputeValue"/> One or more contained <arg-type/> elements within the <replaced-method/> element may be used to indicate the method signature of the method being overridden. Note that the signature for the arguments is actually only needed in the case that the method is actually overloaded and there are multiple variants within the class. For convenience, the type string for an argument may be a substring of the fully qualified type name. For example, all the following would match java.lang.String. java.lang.String String Str Since the number of arguments is often enough to distinguish between each possible choice, this shortcut can save a lot of typing, by allowing you to type just the shortest string that will match an argument type.

When you create a bean definition what you are actually creating is a recipe for creating actual instances of the class defined by that bean definition. The idea that a bean definition is a recipe is important, because it means that, just like a class, you can potentially have many object instances created from a single recipe. You can control not only the various dependencies and configuration values that are to be plugged into an object that is created from a particular bean definition, but also the scope of the objects created from a particular bean definition. This approach is very powerful and gives you the flexibility to choose the scope of the objects you create through configuration instead of having to 'bake in' the scope of an object at the Java class level. Beans can be defined to be deployed in one of a number of scopes: out of the box, the Spring Framework supports exactly five scopes (of which three are available only if you are using a web-aware ApplicationContext). The scopes supported out of the box are listed below: Scope Description singleton Scopes a single bean definition to a single object instance per Spring IoC container. prototype Scopes a single bean definition to any number of object instances. request Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of a single HTTP request; that is each and every HTTP request will have its own instance of a bean created off the back of a single bean definition. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext. session Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of an HTTP Session. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext. global session Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of a global HTTP Session. Typically only valid when used in a portlet context. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext.

When a bean is a singleton, only one shared instance of the bean will be managed, and all requests for beans with an id or ids matching that bean definition will result in that one specific bean instance being returned by the Spring container. To put it another way, when you define a bean definition and it is scoped as a singleton, then the Spring IoC container will create exactly one instance of the object defined by that bean definition. This single instance will be stored in a cache of such singleton beans, and all subsequent requests and references for that named bean will result in the cached object being returned. Please be aware that Spring's concept of a singleton bean is quite different from the Singleton pattern as defined in the seminal Gang of Four (GoF) patterns book. The GoF Singleton hard codes the scope of an object such that one and only one instance of a particular class will ever be created per ClassLoader. The scope of the Spring singleton is best described as per container and per bean. This means that if you define one bean for a particular class in a single Spring container, then the Spring container will create one and only one instance of the class defined by that bean definition. The singleton scope is the default scope in Spring. To define a bean as a singleton in XML, you would write configuration like so: <bean id="accountService" class="com.foo.DefaultAccountService"/> <!-- the following is equivalent, though redundant (singleton scope is the default); using spring-beans-2.0.dtd --> <bean id="accountService" class="com.foo.DefaultAccountService" scope="singleton"/> <!-- the following is equivalent and preserved for backward compatibility in spring-beans.dtd --> <bean id="accountService" class="com.foo.DefaultAccountService" singleton="true"/>

The non-singleton, prototype scope of bean deployment results in the creation of a new bean instance every time a request for that specific bean is made (that is, it is injected into another bean or it is requested via a programmatic getBean() method call on the container). As a rule of thumb, you should use the prototype scope for all beans that are stateful, while the singleton scope should be used for stateless beans. The following diagram illustrates the Spring prototype scope. Please note that a DAO would not typically be configured as a prototype, since a typical DAO would not hold any conversational state; it was just easier for this author to reuse the core of the singleton diagram. To define a bean as a prototype in XML, you would write configuration like so: <!-- using spring-beans-2.0.dtd --> <bean id="accountService" class="com.foo.DefaultAccountService" scope="prototype"/> <!-- the following is equivalent and preserved for backward compatibility in spring-beans.dtd --> <bean id="accountService" class="com.foo.DefaultAccountService" singleton="false"/> There is one quite important thing to be aware of when deploying a bean in the prototype scope, in that the lifecycle of the bean changes slightly. Spring does not manage the complete lifecycle of a prototype bean: the container instantiates, configures, decorates and otherwise assembles a prototype object, hands it to the client and then has no further knowledge of that prototype instance. This means that while initialization lifecycle callback methods will be called on all objects regardless of scope, in the case of prototypes, any configured destruction lifecycle callbacks will not be called. It is the responsibility of the client code to clean up prototype scoped objects and release any expensive resources that the prototype bean(s) are holding onto. (One possible way to get the Spring container to release resources used by prototype-scoped beans is through the use of a custom bean post-processor which would hold a reference to the beans that need to be cleaned up.) In some respects, you can think of the Spring containers role when talking about a prototype-scoped bean as somewhat of a replacement for the Java 'new' operator. All lifecycle aspects past that point have to be handled by the client. (The lifecycle of a bean in the Spring container is further described in the section entitled .)

When using singleton-scoped beans that have dependencies on beans that are scoped as prototypes, please be aware that dependencies are resolved at instantiation time. This means that if you dependency inject a prototype-scoped bean into a singleton-scoped bean, a brand new prototype bean will be instantiated and then dependency injected into the singleton bean... but that is all. That exact same prototype instance will be the sole instance that is ever supplied to the singleton-scoped bean, which is fine if that is what you want. However, sometimes what you actually want is for the singleton-scoped bean to be able to acquire a brand new instance of the prototype-scoped bean again and again and again at runtime. In that case it is no use just dependency injecting a prototype-scoped bean into your singleton bean, because as explained above, that only happens once when the Spring container is instantiating the singleton bean and resolving and injecting its dependencies. If you are in the scenario where you need to get a brand new instance of a (prototype) bean again and again and again at runtime, you are referred to the section entitled If you are referencing the 'spring-beans.dtd' DTD in a bean definition file(s), and you are being explicit about the lifecycle scope of your beans you must use the "singleton" attribute to express the lifecycle scope (remembering that the singleton lifecycle scope is the default). If you are referencing the 'spring-beans-2.0.dtd' DTD or the Spring 2.0 XSD schema, then you will need to use the "scope" attribute (because the "singleton" attribute was removed from the definition of the new DTD and XSD files in favor of the "scope" attribute). To be totally clear about this, this means that if you use the "singleton" attribute in an XML bean definition then you must be referencing the 'spring-beans.dtd' DTD in that file. If you are using the "scope" attribute then you must be referencing either the 'spring-beans-2.0.dtd' DTD or the 'spring-beans-3.0.xsd' XSD in that file.

The other scopes, namely request, session, and global session are for use only in web-based applications (and can be used irrespective of which particular web application framework you are using, if indeed any). In the interest of keeping related concepts together in one place in the reference documentation, these scopes are described here. The scopes that are described in the following paragraphs are only available if you are using a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext implementation (such as XmlWebApplicationContext). If you try using these next scopes with regular Spring IoC containers such as the ClassPathXmlApplicationContext, you will get an IllegalStateException complaining about an unknown bean scope.

In order to support the scoping of beans at the request, session, and global session levels (web-scoped beans), some minor initial configuration is required before you can set about defining your bean definitions. Please note that this extra setup is not required if you just want to use the 'standard' scopes (namely singleton and prototype). Now as things stand, there are a couple of ways to effect this initial setup depending on your particular Servlet environment... If you are accessing scoped beans within Spring Web MVC, i.e. within a request that is processed by the Spring DispatcherServlet, or DispatcherPortlet, then no special setup is necessary: DispatcherServlet and DispatcherPortlet already expose all relevant state. When using a Servlet 2.4+ web container, with requests processed outside of Spring's DispatcherServlet (e.g. when using JSF or Struts), you need to add the following javax.servlet.ServletRequestListener to the declarations in your web application's 'web.xml' file. <web-app> ... <listener> <listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.request.RequestContextListener</listener-class> </listener> ... </web-app> If you are using an older web container (Servlet 2.3), you will need to use the provided javax.servlet.Filter implementation. Find below a snippet of XML configuration that has to be included in the 'web.xml' file of your web application if you want to have access to web-scoped beans in requests outside of Spring's DispatcherServlet on a Servlet 2.3 container. (The filter mapping depends on the surrounding web application configuration and so you will have to change it as appropriate.) <web-app> .. <filter> <filter-name>requestContextFilter</filter-name> <filter-class>org.springframework.web.filter.RequestContextFilter</filter-class> </filter> <filter-mapping> <filter-name>requestContextFilter</filter-name> <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern> </filter-mapping> ... </web-app> That's it. DispatcherServlet, RequestContextListener and RequestContextFilter all do exactly the same thing, namely bind the HTTP request object to the Thread that is servicing that request. This makes beans that are request- and session-scoped available further down the call chain.

Consider the following bean definition: <bean id="loginAction" class="com.foo.LoginAction" scope="request"/> With the above bean definition in place, the Spring container will create a brand new instance of the LoginAction bean using the 'loginAction' bean definition for each and every HTTP request. That is, the 'loginAction' bean will be effectively scoped at the HTTP request level. You can change or dirty the internal state of the instance that is created as much as you want, safe in the knowledge that other requests that are also using instances created off the back of the same 'loginAction' bean definition will not be seeing these changes in state since they are particular to an individual request. When the request is finished processing, the bean that is scoped to the request will be discarded.

Consider the following bean definition: <bean id="userPreferences" class="com.foo.UserPreferences" scope="session"/> With the above bean definition in place, the Spring container will create a brand new instance of the UserPreferences bean using the 'userPreferences' bean definition for the lifetime of a single HTTP Session. In other words, the 'userPreferences' bean will be effectively scoped at the HTTP Session level. Just like request-scoped beans, you can change the internal state of the instance that is created as much as you want, safe in the knowledge that other HTTP Session instances that are also using instances created off the back of the same 'userPreferences' bean definition will not be seeing these changes in state since they are particular to an individual HTTP Session. When the HTTP Session is eventually discarded, the bean that is scoped to that particular HTTP Session will also be discarded.

Consider the following bean definition: <bean id="userPreferences" class="com.foo.UserPreferences" scope="globalSession"/> The global session scope is similar to the standard HTTP Session scope (described immediately above), and really only makes sense in the context of portlet-based web applications. The portlet specification defines the notion of a global Session that is shared amongst all of the various portlets that make up a single portlet web application. Beans defined at the global session scope are scoped (or bound) to the lifetime of the global portlet Session. Please note that if you are writing a standard Servlet-based web application and you define one or more beans as having global session scope, the standard HTTP Session scope will be used, and no error will be raised.

Being able to define a bean scoped to an HTTP request or Session (or indeed a custom scope of your own devising) is all very well, but one of the main value-adds of the Spring IoC container is that it manages not only the instantiation of your objects (beans), but also the wiring up of collaborators (or dependencies). If you want to inject (for example) an HTTP request scoped bean into another bean, you will need to inject an AOP proxy in place of the scoped bean. That is, you need to inject a proxy object that exposes the same public interface as the scoped object but that is smart enough to be able to retrieve the real, target object from the relevant scope (for example an HTTP request) and delegate method calls onto the real object. You do not need to use the <aop:scoped-proxy/> in conjunction with beans that are scoped as singletons or prototypes. It is an error to try to create a scoped proxy for a singleton bean (and the resulting BeanCreationException will certainly set you straight in this regard). Let's look at the configuration that is required to effect this; the configuration is not hugely complex (it takes just one line), but it is important to understand the why as well as the how behind it. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop-3.0.xsd"> <!-- an HTTP Session-scoped bean exposed as a proxy --> <bean id="userPreferences" class="com.foo.UserPreferences" scope="session"> <!-- this next element effects the proxying of the surrounding bean --> <aop:scoped-proxy/> </bean> <!-- a singleton-scoped bean injected with a proxy to the above bean --> <bean id="userService" class="com.foo.SimpleUserService"> <!-- a reference to the proxied 'userPreferences' bean --> <property name="userPreferences" ref="userPreferences"/> </bean> </beans> To create such a proxy, you need only to insert a child <aop:scoped-proxy/> element into a scoped bean definition (you may also need the CGLIB library on your classpath so that the container can effect class-based proxying; you will also need to be using ). So, just why do you need this <aop:scoped-proxy/> element in the definition of beans scoped at the request, session, globalSession and 'insert your custom scope here' level? The reason is best explained by picking apart the following bean definition (please note that the following 'userPreferences' bean definition as it stands is incomplete): <bean id="userPreferences" class="com.foo.UserPreferences" scope="session"/> <bean id="userManager" class="com.foo.UserManager"> <property name="userPreferences" ref="userPreferences"/> </bean> From the above configuration it is evident that the singleton bean 'userManager' is being injected with a reference to the HTTP Session-scoped bean 'userPreferences'. The salient point here is that the 'userManager' bean is a singleton... it will be instantiated exactly once per container, and its dependencies (in this case only one, the 'userPreferences' bean) will also only be injected (once!). This means that the 'userManager' will (conceptually) only ever operate on the exact same 'userPreferences' object, that is the one that it was originally injected with. This is not what you want when you inject an HTTP Session-scoped bean as a dependency into a collaborating object (typically). Rather, what we do want is a single 'userManager' object, and then, for the lifetime of an HTTP Session, we want to see and use a 'userPreferences' object that is specific to said HTTP Session. Rather what you need then is to inject some sort of object that exposes the exact same public interface as the UserPreferences class (ideally an object that is a UserPreferences instance) and that is smart enough to be able to go off and fetch the real UserPreferences object from whatever underlying scoping mechanism we have chosen (HTTP request, Session, etc.). We can then safely inject this proxy object into the 'userManager' bean, which will be blissfully unaware that the UserPreferences reference that it is holding onto is a proxy. In the case of this example, when a UserManager instance invokes a method on the dependency-injected UserPreferences object, it is really invoking a method on the proxy... the proxy will then go off and fetch the real UserPreferences object from (in this case) the HTTP Session, and delegate the method invocation onto the retrieved real UserPreferences object. That is why you need the following, correct and complete, configuration when injecting request-, session-, and globalSession-scoped beans into collaborating objects: <bean id="userPreferences" class="com.foo.UserPreferences" scope="session"> <aop:scoped-proxy/> </bean> <bean id="userManager" class="com.foo.UserManager"> <property name="userPreferences" ref="userPreferences"/> </bean>

By default, when the Spring container is creating a proxy for a bean that is marked up with the <aop:scoped-proxy/> element, a CGLIB-based class proxy will be created. This means that you need to have the CGLIB library on the classpath of your application. Note: CGLIB proxies will only intercept public method calls! Do not call non-public methods on such a proxy; they will not be delegated to the scoped target object. You can choose to have the Spring container create 'standard' JDK interface-based proxies for such scoped beans by specifying 'false' for the value of the 'proxy-target-class' attribute of the <aop:scoped-proxy/> element. Using JDK interface-based proxies does mean that you don't need any additional libraries on your application's classpath to effect such proxying, but it does mean that the class of the scoped bean must implement at least one interface, and all of the collaborators into which the scoped bean is injected must be referencing the bean via one of its interfaces. <!-- DefaultUserPreferences implements the UserPreferences interface --> <bean id="userPreferences" class="com.foo.DefaultUserPreferences" scope="session"> <aop:scoped-proxy proxy-target-class="false"/> </bean> <bean id="userManager" class="com.foo.UserManager"> <property name="userPreferences" ref="userPreferences"/> </bean> The section entitled may also be of some interest with regard to understanding the nuances of choosing whether class-based or interface-based proxying is right for you.

As of Spring 2.0, the bean scoping mechanism in Spring is extensible. This means that you are not limited to just the bean scopes that Spring provides out of the box; you can define your own scopes, or even redefine the existing scopes (although that last one would probably be considered bad practice - please note that you cannot override the built-in singleton and prototype scopes).

Scopes are defined by the org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope interface. This is the interface that you will need to implement in order to integrate your own custom scope(s) into the Spring container, and is described in detail below. You may wish to look at the Scope implementations that are supplied with the Spring Framework itself for an idea of how to go about implementing your own. The Scope Javadoc explains the main class to implement when you need your own scope in more detail too. The Scope interface has four methods dealing with getting objects from the scope, removing them from the scope and allowing them to be 'destroyed' if needed. The first method should return the object from the underlying scope. The session scope implementation, for example, will return the session-scoped bean (and if it does not exist, return a new instance of the bean, after having bound it to the session for future reference). Object get(String name, ObjectFactory objectFactory) The second method should remove the object from the underlying scope. The session scope implementation for example, removes the session-scoped bean from the underlying session. The object should be returned (you are allowed to return null if the object with the specified name wasn't found) Object remove(String name) The third method is used to register callbacks the scope should execute when it is destroyed or when the specified object in the scope is destroyed. Please refer to the Javadoc or a Spring scope implementation for more information on destruction callbacks. void registerDestructionCallback(String name, Runnable destructionCallback) The last method deals with obtaining the conversation identifier for the underlying scope. This identifier is different for each scope. For a session for example, this can be the session identifier. String getConversationId()

After you have written and tested one or more custom Scope implementations, you then need to make the Spring container aware of your new scope(s). The central method to register a new Scope with the Spring container is declared on the ConfigurableBeanFactory interface (implemented by most of the concrete BeanFactory implementations that ship with Spring); this central method is displayed below: void registerScope(String scopeName, Scope scope); The first argument to the registerScope(..) method is the unique name associated with a scope; examples of such names in the Spring container itself are 'singleton' and 'prototype'. The second argument to the registerScope(..) method is an actual instance of the custom Scope implementation that you wish to register and use. Let's assume that you have written your own custom Scope implementation, and you have registered it like so: // note: the ThreadScope class does not ship with the Spring Framework Scope customScope = new ThreadScope(); beanFactory.registerScope("thread", customScope); You can then create bean definitions that adhere to the scoping rules of your custom Scope like so: <bean id="..." class="..." scope="thread"/> If you have your own custom Scope implementation(s), you are not just limited to only programmatic registration of the custom scope(s). You can also do the Scope registration declaratively, using the CustomScopeConfigurer class. The declarative registration of custom Scope implementations using the CustomScopeConfigurer class is shown below: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop-3.0.xsd"> <bean class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.CustomScopeConfigurer"> <property name="scopes"> <map> <entry key="thread"> <bean class="com.foo.ThreadScope"/> </entry> </map> </property> </bean> <bean id="bar" class="x.y.Bar" scope="thread"> <property name="name" value="Rick"/> <aop:scoped-proxy/> </bean> <bean id="foo" class="x.y.Foo"> <property name="bar" ref="bar"/> </bean> </beans> Note that, when placing a <aop:scoped-proxy/> in a FactoryBean implementation, it is the factory bean itself that is scoped, not the object returned from getObject().

The Spring Framework provides several callback interfaces to change the behavior of your bean in the container; they include InitializingBean and DisposableBean. Implementing these interfaces will result in the container calling afterPropertiesSet() for the former and destroy() for the latter to allow the bean to perform certain actions upon initialization and destruction. Internally, the Spring Framework uses BeanPostProcessor implementations to process any callback interfaces it can find and call the appropriate methods. If you need custom features or other lifecycle behavior Spring doesn't offer out-of-the-box, you can implement a BeanPostProcessor yourself. More information about this can be found in the section entitled . All the different lifecycle callback interfaces are described below. In one of the appendices, you can find diagrams that show how Spring manages beans, how those lifecycle features change the nature of your beans, and how they are managed.

Implementing the org.springframework.beans.factory.InitializingBean interface allows a bean to perform initialization work after all necessary properties on the bean have been set by the container. The InitializingBean interface specifies exactly one method: void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception; Generally, the use of the InitializingBean interface can be avoided and is actually discouraged since it unnecessarily couples the code to Spring. As an alternative, bean definitions provide support for a generic initialization method to be specified. In the case of XML-based configuration metadata, this is done using the 'init-method' attribute. For example, the following definition: <bean id="exampleInitBean" class="examples.ExampleBean" init-method="init"/> public class ExampleBean { public void init() { // do some initialization work } } ...is exactly the same as... <bean id="exampleInitBean" class="examples.AnotherExampleBean"/> public class AnotherExampleBean implements InitializingBean { public void afterPropertiesSet() { // do some initialization work } } ... but does not couple the code to Spring.

Implementing the org.springframework.beans.factory.DisposableBean interface allows a bean to get a callback when the container containing it is destroyed. The DisposableBean interface specifies a single method: void destroy() throws Exception; Generally, the use of the DisposableBean callback interface can be avoided and is actually discouraged since it unnecessarily couples the code to Spring. As an alternative, bean definitions provide support for a generic destroy method to be specified. When using XML-based configuration metadata this is done via the 'destroy-method' attribute on the <bean/>. For example, the following definition: <bean id="exampleInitBean" class="examples.ExampleBean" destroy-method="cleanup"/> public class ExampleBean { public void cleanup() { // do some destruction work (like releasing pooled connections) } } ...is exactly the same as... <bean id="exampleInitBean" class="examples.AnotherExampleBean"/> public class AnotherExampleBean implements DisposableBean { public void destroy() { // do some destruction work (like releasing pooled connections) } } ... but does not couple the code to Spring.

When writing initialization and destroy method callbacks that do not use the Spring-specific InitializingBean and DisposableBean callback interfaces, one typically finds oneself writing methods with names such as init(), initialize(), dispose(), etc. The names of such lifecycle callback methods are (hopefully!) standardized across a project so that all developers on a team use the same method names and thus ensure some level of consistency. The Spring container can be configured to 'look' for named initialization and destroy callback method names on every bean. This means that you, as an application developer, can simply write your application classes, use a convention of having an initialization callback called init(), and then (without having to configure each and every bean with, in the case of XML-based configuration, an 'init-method="init"' attribute) be safe in the knowledge that the Spring IoC container will call that method when the bean is being created (and in accordance with the standard lifecycle callback contract described previously). Let's look at an example to make the use of this feature completely clear. For the sake of the example, let us say that one of the coding conventions on a project is that all initialization callback methods are to be named init() and that destroy callback methods are to be called destroy(). This leads to classes like so... public class DefaultBlogService implements BlogService { private BlogDao blogDao; public void setBlogDao(BlogDao blogDao) { this.blogDao = blogDao; } // this is (unsurprisingly) the initialization callback method public void init() { if (this.blogDao == null) { throw new IllegalStateException("The [blogDao] property must be set."); } } } <beans default-init-method="init"> <bean id="blogService" class="com.foo.DefaultBlogService"> <property name="blogDao" ref="blogDao" /> </bean> </beans> Notice the use of the 'default-init-method' attribute on the top-level <beans/> element. The presence of this attribute means that the Spring IoC container will recognize a method called 'init' on beans as being the initialization method callback, and when a bean is being created and assembled, if the bean's class has such a method, it will be invoked at the appropriate time. Destroy method callbacks are configured similarly (in XML that is) using the 'default-destroy-method' attribute on the top-level <beans/> element. The use of this feature can save you the (small) housekeeping chore of specifying an initialization and destroy method callback on each and every bean, and it is great for enforcing a consistent naming convention for initialization and destroy method callbacks, as consistency is something that should always be aimed for. Consider the case where you have some existing beans where the underlying classes already have initialization callback methods that are named at variance with the convention. You can always override the default by specifying (in XML that is) the method name using the 'init-method' and 'destroy-method' attributes on the <bean/> element itself. Finally, please be aware that the Spring container guarantees that a configured initialization callback is called immediately after a bean has been supplied with all of its dependencies. This means that the initialization callback will be called on the raw bean reference, which means that any AOP interceptors or suchlike that will ultimately be applied to the bean will not yet be in place. A target bean is fully created first, then an AOP proxy (for example) with its interceptor chain is applied. Note that, if the target bean and the proxy are defined separately, your code can even interact with the raw target bean, bypassing the proxy. Hence, it would be very inconsistent to apply the interceptors to the init method, since that would couple the lifecycle of the target bean with its proxy/interceptors and leave strange semantics when talking to the raw target bean directly.

As of Spring 2.5, there are three options for controlling bean lifecycle behavior: the InitializingBean and DisposableBean callback interfaces; custom init() and destroy() methods; and the @PostConstruct and @PreDestroy annotations. When combining different lifecycle mechanisms - for example, in a class hierarchy in which various lifecycle mechanisms are in use - developers should be aware of the order in which these mechanisms are applied. The following is the ordering for initialization methods: Methods annotated with @PostConstruct afterPropertiesSet() as defined by the InitializingBean callback interface A custom configured init() method Destroy methods are called in the same order: Methods annotated with @PreDestroy destroy() as defined by the DisposableBean callback interface A custom configured destroy() method If multiple lifecycle mechanisms are configured for a given bean, and each mechanism is configured with a different method name, then each configured method will be executed in the order listed above; however, if the same method name is configured - for example, init() for an initialization method - for more than one of the aforementioned lifecycle mechanisms, that method will only be executed once.

This next section does not apply to web applications (in case the title of this section did not make that abundantly clear). Spring's web-based ApplicationContext implementations already have code in place to handle shutting down the Spring IoC container gracefully when the relevant web application is being shutdown. If you are using Spring's IoC container in a non-web application environment, for example in a rich client desktop environment, and you want the container to shutdown gracefully and call the relevant destroy callbacks on your singleton beans, you will need to register a shutdown hook with the JVM. This is quite easy to do (see below), and will ensure that your Spring IoC container shuts down gracefully and that all resources held by your singletons are released. Of course it is still up to you to both configure the destroy callbacks for your singletons and implement such destroy callbacks correctly. So to register a shutdown hook that enables the graceful shutdown of the relevant Spring IoC container, you simply need to call the registerShutdownHook() method that is declared on the AbstractApplicationContext class. To wit... import org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; public final class Boot { public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception { AbstractApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String []{"beans.xml"}); // add a shutdown hook for the above context... ctx.registerShutdownHook(); // app runs here... // main method exits, hook is called prior to the app shutting down... } }

A class which implements the org.springframework.contxt.ApplicationContextAware interface is provided with a reference to the ApplicationContext that created it, when it is created by that ApplicationContext. public interface ApplicationContextAware { void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException; } This allows beans to manipulate the ApplicationContext that created them programmatically, through the ApplicationContext interface, or by casting the reference to a known subclass of this which exposes additional functionality, for example ConfigurableApplicationContext. One use would be the programmatic retrieval of other beans. While there are cases when this capability is useful, it should generally be avoided, since it couples the code to Spring and does not follow the Inversion of Control style, where collaborators are provided to beans as properties. Other methods on the ApplicationContext provide access to file resources, publishing application events, or accessing a MessageSource. These additional features are described in the section As of Spring 2.5, you can rely upon autowiring of the ApplicationContext as yet another alternative to implementing the ApplicationContextAware interface. The "traditional" constructor and byType autowiring modes (as described in the section entitled ) are now capable of providing a dependency of type ApplicationContext for either a constructor argument or setter method parameter respectively. For more flexibility (including the ability to autowire fields and multiple parameter methods), consider using the new annotation-based autowiring features. In that case, the ApplicationFactory will be autowired into a field, constructor argument, or method parameter that is expecting the BeanFactory type as long as the field, constructor, or method in question carries the @Autowired annotation. For more information, see the section entitled .

If a bean implements the org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanNameAware interface the and is deployed in a ApplicationContext will call the bean through this interface to inform the bean of the name it was deployed under. The callback will be invoked after population of normal bean properties but before an initialization callback like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet or a custom init-method.

A bean definition potentially contains a large amount of configuration information, including container specific information (for example initialization method, static factory method name, and so forth) and constructor arguments and property values. A child bean definition is a bean definition that inherits configuration data from a parent definition. It is then able to override some values, or add others, as needed. Using parent and child bean definitions can potentially save a lot of typing. Effectively, this is a form of templating. When working with a ApplicationContext programmatically, child bean definitions are represented by the ChildBeanDefinition class. Most users will never work with them on this level, instead configuring bean definitions declaratively in something like the ClassPathXmlApplicationContext. When using XML-based configuration metadata a child bean definition is indicated simply by using the 'parent' attribute, specifying the parent bean as the value of this attribute. <bean id="inheritedTestBean" abstract="true" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean"> <property name="name" value="parent"/> <property name="age" value="1"/> </bean> <bean id="inheritsWithDifferentClass" class="org.springframework.beans.DerivedTestBean" parent="inheritedTestBean" init-method="initialize"> <property name="name" value="override"/> <!-- the age property value of 1 will be inherited from parent --> </bean> A child bean definition will use the bean class from the parent definition if none is specified, but can also override it. In the latter case, the child bean class must be compatible with the parent, that is it must accept the parent's property values. A child bean definition will inherit constructor argument values, property values and method overrides from the parent, with the option to add new values. If any init-method, destroy-method and/or static factory method settings are specified, they will override the corresponding parent settings. The remaining settings will always be taken from the child definition: depends on, autowire mode, dependency check, singleton, scope, lazy init. Note that in the example above, we have explicitly marked the parent bean definition as abstract by using the abstract attribute. In the case that the parent definition does not specify a class, and so explicitly marking the parent bean definition as abstract is required: <bean id="inheritedTestBeanWithoutClass" abstract="true"> <property name="name" value="parent"/> <property name="age" value="1"/> </bean> <bean id="inheritsWithClass" class="org.springframework.beans.DerivedTestBean" parent="inheritedTestBeanWithoutClass" init-method="initialize"> <property name="name" value="override"/> <!-- age will inherit the value of 1 from the parent bean definition--> </bean> The parent bean cannot get instantiated on its own since it is incomplete, and it is also explicitly marked as abstract. When a definition is defined to be abstract like this, it is usable only as a pure template bean definition that will serve as a parent definition for child definitions. Trying to use such an abstract parent bean on its own (by referring to it as a ref property of another bean, or doing an explicit getBean() call with the parent bean id), will result in an error. Similarly, the container's internal preInstantiateSingletons() method will completely ignore bean definitions which are defined as abstract. ApplicationContexts will by default pre-instantiate all singletons. Therefore it is important (at least for singleton beans) that if you have a (parent) bean definition which you intend to use only as a template, and this definition specifies a class, you must make sure to set the 'abstract' attribute to 'true', otherwise the application context will actually (attempt to) pre-instantiate the abstract bean.

The IoC component of the Spring Framework has been designed for extension. There is typically no need for an application developer to subclass any of the various ApplicationContext implementation classes. The Spring IoC container can be infinitely extended by plugging in implementations of special integration interfaces. The next few sections are devoted to detailing all of these various integration interfaces.

The first extension point that we will look at is the BeanPostProcessor interface. This interface defines a number of callback methods that you as an application developer can implement in order to provide your own (or override the containers default) instantiation logic, dependency-resolution logic, and so forth. If you want to do some custom logic after the Spring container has finished instantiating, configuring and otherwise initializing a bean, you can plug in one or more BeanPostProcessor implementations. You can configure multiple BeanPostProcessors if you wish. You can control the order in which these BeanPostProcessors execute by setting the 'order' property (you can only set this property if the BeanPostProcessor implements the Ordered interface; if you write your own BeanPostProcessor you should consider implementing the Ordered interface too); consult the Javadoc for the BeanPostProcessor and Ordered interfaces for more details. BeanPostProcessors operate on bean (or object) instances; that is to say, the Spring IoC container will have instantiated a bean instance for you, and then BeanPostProcessors get a chance to do their stuff. If you want to change the actual bean definition (that is the recipe that defines the bean), then you rather need to use a BeanFactoryPostProcessor (described below in the section entitled . Also, BeanPostProcessors are scoped per-container. This is only relevant if you are using container hierarchies. If you define a BeanPostProcessor in one container, it will only do its stuff on the beans in that container. Beans that are defined in another container will not be post-processed by BeanPostProcessors in another container, even if both containers are part of the same hierarchy. The org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanPostProcessor interface consists of exactly two callback methods. When such a class is registered as a post-processor with the container (see below for how this registration is effected), for each bean instance that is created by the container, the post-processor will get a callback from the container both before any container initialization methods (such as afterPropertiesSet and any declared init method) are called, and also afterwards. The post-processor is free to do what it wishes with the bean instance, including ignoring the callback completely. A bean post-processor will typically check for callback interfaces, or do something such as wrap a bean with a proxy; some of the Spring AOP infrastructure classes are implemented as bean post-processors and they do this proxy-wrapping logic. It is important to note that an ApplicationContext will automatically detect any beans which are defined in the configuration metadata which is supplied to it that implement the BeanPostProcessor interface, and register them as post-processors, to be then called appropriately by the container on bean creation. Nothing else needs to be done other than deploying the post-processors in a similar fashion to any other bean. Classes that implement the BeanPostProcessor interface are special, and so they are treated differently by the container. All BeanPostProcessors and their directly referenced beans will be instantiated on startup, as part of the special startup phase of the ApplicationContext, then all those BeanPostProcessors will be registered in a sorted fashion - and applied to all further beans. Since AOP auto-proxying is implemented as a BeanPostProcessor itself, no BeanPostProcessors or directly referenced beans are eligible for auto-proxying (and thus will not have aspects 'woven' into them. For any such bean, you should see an info log message: Bean 'foo' is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying). Find below some examples of how to write, register, and use BeanPostProcessors in the context of an ApplicationContext.

This first example is hardly compelling, but serves to illustrate basic usage. All we are going to do is code a custom BeanPostProcessor implementation that simply invokes the toString() method of each bean as it is created by the container and prints the resulting string to the system console. Yes, it is not hugely useful, but serves to get the basic concepts across before we move into the second example which is actually useful. Find below the custom BeanPostProcessor implementation class definition: package scripting; import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanPostProcessor; import org.springframework.beans.BeansException; public class InstantiationTracingBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor { // simply return the instantiated bean as-is public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { return bean; // we could potentially return any object reference here... } public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { System.out.println("Bean '" + beanName + "' created : " + bean.toString()); return bean; } } <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:lang="http://www.springframework.org/schema/lang" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/lang http://www.springframework.org/schema/lang/spring-lang-3.0.xsd"> <lang:groovy id="messenger" script-source="classpath:org/springframework/scripting/groovy/Messenger.groovy"> <lang:property name="message" value="Fiona Apple Is Just So Dreamy."/> </lang:groovy> <!-- when the above bean ('messenger') is instantiated, this custom BeanPostProcessor implementation will output the fact to the system console --> <bean class="scripting.InstantiationTracingBeanPostProcessor"/> </beans> Notice how the InstantiationTracingBeanPostProcessor is simply defined; it doesn't even have a name, and because it is a bean it can be dependency injected just like any other bean. (The above configuration also just so happens to define a bean that is backed by a Groovy script. The Spring 2.0 dynamic language support is detailed in the chapter entitled .) Find below a small driver script to exercise the above code and configuration; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; import org.springframework.scripting.Messenger; public final class Boot { public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception { ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("scripting/beans.xml"); Messenger messenger = (Messenger) ctx.getBean("messenger"); System.out.println(messenger); } } The output of executing the above program will be (something like) this: Bean 'messenger' created : org.springframework.scripting.groovy.GroovyMessenger@272961 org.springframework.scripting.groovy.GroovyMessenger@272961

Using callback interfaces or annotations in conjunction with a custom BeanPostProcessor implementation is a common means of extending the Spring IoC container. This next example is a bit of a cop-out, in that you are directed to the section entitled which demonstrates the usage of a custom BeanPostProcessor implementation that ships with the Spring distribution which ensures that JavaBean properties on beans that are marked with an (arbitrary) annotation are actually (configured to be) dependency-injected with a value.

The next extension point that we will look at is the org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanFactoryPostProcessor. The semantics of this interface are similar to the BeanPostProcessor, with one major difference: BeanFactoryPostProcessors operate on the bean configuration metadata; that is, the Spring IoC container will allow BeanFactoryPostProcessors to read the configuration metadata and potentially change it before the container has actually instantiated any other beans. You can configure multiple BeanFactoryPostProcessors if you wish. You can control the order in which these BeanFactoryPostProcessors execute by setting the 'order' property (you can only set this property if the BeanFactoryPostProcessor implements the Ordered interface; if you write your own BeanFactoryPostProcessor you should consider implementing the Ordered interface too); consult the Javadoc for the BeanFactoryPostProcessor and Ordered interfaces for more details. If you want to change the actual bean instances (the objects that are created from the configuration metadata), then you rather need to use a BeanPostProcessor (described above in the section entitled . Also, BeanFactoryPostProcessors are scoped per-container. This is only relevant if you are using container hierarchies. If you define a BeanFactoryPostProcessor in one container, it will only do its stuff on the bean definitions in that container. Bean definitions in another container will not be post-processed by BeanFactoryPostProcessors in another container, even if both containers are part of the same hierarchy. A bean factory post-processor is executed automatically when declared inside of an ApplicationContext to apply changes of some sort to the configuration metadata that defines a container. Spring includes a number of pre-existing bean factory post-processors, such as PropertyOverrideConfigurer and PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer. A custom BeanFactoryPostProcessor can also be used to register custom property editors, for example. An ApplicationContext will detect any beans which are deployed into it which implement the BeanFactoryPostProcessor interface, and automatically use them as bean factory post-processors, at the appropriate time. Nothing else needs to be done other than deploying these post-processor in a similar fashion to any other bean. Just as in the case of BeanPostProcessors, you typically don't want to have BeanFactoryPostProcessors marked as being lazily-initialized. If they are marked as such, then the Spring container will never instantiate them, and thus they won't get a chance to apply their custom logic. If you are using the 'default-lazy-init' attribute on the declaration of your <beans/> element, be sure to mark your various BeanFactoryPostProcessor bean definitions with 'lazy-init="false"'.

The PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer is used to externalize property values from a bean definition into another separate file in the standard Java Properties format. This is useful to allow the person deploying an application to customize environment-specific properties (for example database URLs, usernames and passwords), without the complexity or risk of modifying the main XML definition file or files for the container. Consider the following XML-based configuration metadata fragment, where a DataSource with placeholder values is defined. We will configure some properties from an external Properties file, and at runtime, we will apply a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer to the metadata which will replace some properties of the DataSource: <bean class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> <property name="locations"> <value>classpath:com/foo/jdbc.properties</value> </property> </bean> <bean id="dataSource" destroy-method="close" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource"> <property name="driverClassName" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}"/> <property name="url" value="${jdbc.url}"/> <property name="username" value="${jdbc.username}"/> <property name="password" value="${jdbc.password}"/> </bean> The actual values come from another file in the standard Java Properties format: jdbc.driverClassName=org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver jdbc.url=jdbc:hsqldb:hsql://production:9002 jdbc.username=sa jdbc.password=root With the context namespace introduced in Spring 2.5, it is possible to configure property placeholders with a dedicated configuration element. Multiple locations may be provided as a comma-separated list for the location attribute. <context:property-placeholder location="classpath:com/foo/jdbc.properties"/> The PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer doesn't only look for properties in the Properties file you specify, but also checks against the Java System properties if it cannot find a property you are trying to use. This behavior can be customized by setting the systemPropertiesMode property of the configurer. It has three values, one to tell the configurer to always override, one to let it never override and one to let it override only if the property cannot be found in the properties file specified. Please consult the Javadoc for the PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer for more information. The PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer can be used to substitute class names, which is sometimes useful when you have to pick a particular implementation class at runtime. For example: <bean class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> <property name="locations"> <value>classpath:com/foo/strategy.properties</value> </property> <property name="properties"> <value>custom.strategy.class=com.foo.DefaultStrategy</value> </property> </bean> <bean id="serviceStrategy" class="${custom.strategy.class}"/> If the class is unable to be resolved at runtime to a valid class, resolution of the bean will fail once it is about to be created (which is during the preInstantiateSingletons() phase of an ApplicationContext for a non-lazy-init bean.)

The PropertyOverrideConfigurer, another bean factory post-processor, is similar to the PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer, but in contrast to the latter, the original definitions can have default values or no values at all for bean properties. If an overriding Properties file does not have an entry for a certain bean property, the default context definition is used. Note that the bean factory definition is not aware of being overridden, so it is not immediately obvious when looking at the XML definition file that the override configurer is being used. In case that there are multiple PropertyOverrideConfigurer instances that define different values for the same bean property, the last one will win (due to the overriding mechanism). Properties file configuration lines are expected to be in the format: beanName.property=value An example properties file might look like this: dataSource.driverClassName=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver dataSource.url=jdbc:mysql:mydb This example file would be usable against a container definition which contains a bean called dataSource, which has driver and url properties. Note that compound property names are also supported, as long as every component of the path except the final property being overridden is already non-null (presumably initialized by the constructors). In this example... foo.fred.bob.sammy=123 ... the sammy property of the bob property of the fred property of the foo bean is being set to the scalar value 123. Note: Specified override values are always literal values; they are not translated into bean references. This also applies when the original value in the XML bean definition specifies a bean reference With the context namespace introduced in Spring 2.5, it is possible to configure property overriding with a dedicated configuration element: <context:property-override location="classpath:override.properties"/>

The org.springframework.beans.factory.FactoryBean interface is to be implemented by objects that are themselves factories. The FactoryBean interface is a point of pluggability into the Spring IoC containers instantiation logic. If you have some complex initialization code that is better expressed in Java as opposed to a (potentially) verbose amount of XML, you can create your own FactoryBean, write the complex initialization inside that class, and then plug your custom FactoryBean into the container. The FactoryBean interface provides three methods: Object getObject(): has to return an instance of the object this factory creates. The instance can possibly be shared (depending on whether this factory returns singletons or prototypes). boolean isSingleton(): has to return true if this FactoryBean returns singletons, false otherwise Class getObjectType(): has to return either the object type returned by the getObject() method or null if the type isn't known in advance The FactoryBean concept and interface is used in a number of places within the Spring Framework; at the time of writing there are over 50 implementations of the FactoryBean interface that ship with Spring itself. Finally, there is sometimes a need to ask a container for an actual FactoryBean instance itself, not the bean it produces. This may be achieved by prepending the bean id with '&' (sans quotes) when calling the getBean method of the ApplicationContext. So for a given FactoryBean with an id of myBean, invoking getBean("myBean") on the container will return the product of the FactoryBean, but invoking getBean("&myBean") will return the FactoryBean instance itself.

While the beans package provides basic functionality for managing and manipulating beans, including in a programmatic way, the context package adds the ApplicationContext interface, which enhances BeanFactory functionality in a more framework-oriented style. Many users will use ApplicationContext in a completely declarative fashion, not even having to create it programmatically, but instead relying on support classes such as ContextLoader to automatically instantiate an ApplicationContext as part of the normal startup process of a J2EE web-app. The basis for the context package is the ApplicationContext interface, located in the org.springframework.context package. Deriving from the BeanFactory interface, it provides all the functionality of BeanFactory. To allow working in a more framework-oriented fashion, using layering and hierarchical contexts, the context package also provides the following functionality: MessageSource, providing access to messages in i18n-style. Access to resources, such as URLs and files. Event propagation to beans implementing the ApplicationListener interface. Loading of multiple (hierarchical) contexts, allowing each to be focused on one particular layer, for example the web layer of an application.

The ApplicationContext interface extends an interface called MessageSource, and therefore provides messaging (i18n or internationalization) functionality. Together with the HierarchicalMessageSource, capable of resolving hierarchical messages, these are the basic interfaces Spring provides to do message resolution. Let's quickly review the methods defined there: String getMessage(String code, Object[] args, String default, Locale loc): the basic method used to retrieve a message from the MessageSource. When no message is found for the specified locale, the default message is used. Any arguments passed in are used as replacement values, using the MessageFormat functionality provided by the standard library. String getMessage(String code, Object[] args, Locale loc): essentially the same as the previous method, but with one difference: no default message can be specified; if the message cannot be found, a NoSuchMessageException is thrown. String getMessage(MessageSourceResolvable resolvable, Locale locale): all properties used in the methods above are also wrapped in a class named MessageSourceResolvable, which you can use via this method. When an ApplicationContext gets loaded, it automatically searches for a MessageSource bean defined in the context. The bean has to have the name 'messageSource'. If such a bean is found, all calls to the methods described above will be delegated to the message source that was found. If no message source was found, the ApplicationContext attempts to see if it has a parent containing a bean with the same name. If so, it uses that bean as the MessageSource. If it can't find any source for messages, an empty DelegatingMessageSource will be instantiated in order to be able to accept calls to the methods defined above. Spring currently provides two MessageSource implementations. These are the ResourceBundleMessageSource and the StaticMessageSource. Both implement HierarchicalMessageSource in order to do nested messaging. The StaticMessageSource is hardly ever used but provides programmatic ways to add messages to the source. The ResourceBundleMessageSource is more interesting and is the one we will provide an example for: <beans> <bean id="messageSource" class="org.springframework.context.support.ResourceBundleMessageSource"> <property name="basenames"> <list> <value>format</value> <value>exceptions</value> <value>windows</value> </list> </property> </bean> </beans> This assumes you have three resource bundles defined on your classpath called format, exceptions and windows. Using the JDK standard way of resolving messages through ResourceBundles, any request to resolve a message will be handled. For the purposes of the example, lets assume the contents of two of the above resource bundle files are... # in 'format.properties' message=Alligators rock! # in 'exceptions.properties' argument.required=The '{0}' argument is required. Some (admittedly trivial) driver code to exercise the MessageSource functionality can be found below. Remember that all ApplicationContext implementations are also MessageSource implementations and so can be cast to the MessageSource interface. public static void main(String[] args) { MessageSource resources = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml"); String message = resources.getMessage("message", null, "Default", null); System.out.println(message); } The resulting output from the above program will be... Alligators rock! So to summarize, the MessageSource is defined in a file called 'beans.xml' (this file exists at the root of your classpath). The 'messageSource' bean definition refers to a number of resource bundles via its basenames property; the three files that are passed in the list to the basenames property exist as files at the root of your classpath (and are called format.properties, exceptions.properties, and windows.properties respectively). Lets look at another example, and this time we will look at passing arguments to the message lookup; these arguments will be converted into Strings and inserted into placeholders in the lookup message. This is perhaps best explained with an example: <beans> <!-- this MessageSource is being used in a web application --> <bean id="messageSource" class="org.springframework.context.support.ResourceBundleMessageSource"> <property name="basename" value="test-messages"/> </bean> <!-- let's inject the above MessageSource into this POJO --> <bean id="example" class="com.foo.Example"> <property name="messages" ref="messageSource"/> </bean> </beans> public class Example { private MessageSource messages; public void setMessages(MessageSource messages) { this.messages = messages; } public void execute() { String message = this.messages.getMessage("argument.required", new Object [] {"userDao"}, "Required", null); System.out.println(message); } } The resulting output from the invocation of the execute() method will be... The 'userDao' argument is required. With regard to internationalization (i18n), Spring's various MessageResource implementations follow the same locale resolution and fallback rules as the standard JDK ResourceBundle. In short, and continuing with the example 'messageSource' defined previously, if you want to resolve messages against the British (en-GB) locale, you would create files called format_en_GB.properties, exceptions_en_GB.properties, and windows_en_GB.properties respectively. Locale resolution is typically going to be managed by the surrounding environment of the application. For the purpose of this example though, we'll just manually specify the locale that we want to resolve our (British) messages against. # in 'exceptions_en_GB.properties' argument.required=Ebagum lad, the '{0}' argument is required, I say, required. public static void main(final String[] args) { MessageSource resources = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml"); String message = resources.getMessage("argument.required", new Object [] {"userDao"}, "Required", Locale.UK); System.out.println(message); } The resulting output from the running of the above program will be... Ebagum lad, the 'userDao' argument is required, I say, required. The MessageSourceAware interface can also be used to acquire a reference to any MessageSource that has been defined. Any bean that is defined in an ApplicationContext that implements the MessageSourceAware interface will be injected with the application context's MessageSource when it (the bean) is being created and configured. Note: As an alternative to ResourceBundleMessageSource, Spring also provides a ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource class. This variant supports the same bundle file format but is more flexible than the standard JDK based ResourceBundleMessageSource implementation. In particular, it allows for reading files from any Spring resource location (not just from the classpath) and supports hot reloading of bundle property files (while efficiently caching them in between). Check out the ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource javadoc for details.

Event handling in the ApplicationContext is provided through the ApplicationEvent class and ApplicationListener interface. If a bean which implements the ApplicationListener interface is deployed into the context, every time an ApplicationEvent gets published to the ApplicationContext, that bean will be notified. Essentially, this is the standard Observer design pattern. Spring provides the following standard events: Event Explanation ContextRefreshedEvent Published when the ApplicationContext is initialized or refreshed, e.g. using the refresh() method on the ConfigurableApplicationContext interface. "Initialized" here means that all beans are loaded, post-processor beans are detected and activated, singletons are pre-instantiated, and the ApplicationContext object is ready for use. A refresh may be triggered multiple times, as long as the context hasn't been closed - provided that the chosen ApplicationContext actually supports such "hot" refreshes (which e.g. XmlWebApplicationContext does but GenericApplicationContext doesn't). ContextStartedEvent Published when the ApplicationContext is started, using the start() method on the ConfigurableApplicationContext interface. "Started" here means that all Lifecycle beans will receive an explicit start signal. This will typically be used for restarting after an explicit stop, but may also be used for starting components that haven't been configured for autostart (e.g. haven't started on initialization already). ContextStoppedEvent Published when the ApplicationContext is stopped, using the stop() method on the ConfigurableApplicationContext interface. "Stopped" here means that all Lifecycle beans will receive an explicit stop signal. A stopped context may be restarted through a start() call. ContextClosedEvent Published when the ApplicationContext is closed, using the close() method on the ConfigurableApplicationContext interface. "Closed" here means that all singleton beans are destroyed. A closed context has reached its end of life; it cannot be refreshed or restarted. RequestHandledEvent A web-specific event telling all beans that an HTTP request has been serviced (this will be published after the request has been finished). Note that this event is only applicable for web applications using Spring's DispatcherServlet. Implementing custom events can be done as well. Simply call the publishEvent() method on the ApplicationContext, specifying a parameter which is an instance of your custom event class implementing ApplicationEvent. Event listeners receive events synchronously. This means the publishEvent() method blocks until all listeners have finished processing the event (it is possible to supply an alternate event publishing strategy via a ApplicationEventMulticaster implementation). Furthermore, when a listener receives an event it operates inside the transaction context of the publisher, if a transaction context is available. Let's look at an example. First, the ApplicationContext: <bean id="emailer" class="example.EmailBean"> <property name="blackList"> <list> <value>black@list.org</value> <value>white@list.org</value> <value>john@doe.org</value> </list> </property> </bean> <bean id="blackListListener" class="example.BlackListNotifier"> <property name="notificationAddress" value="spam@list.org"/> </bean> Now, let's look at the actual classes: public class EmailBean implements ApplicationContextAware { private List blackList; private ApplicationContext ctx; public void setBlackList(List blackList) { this.blackList = blackList; } public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext ctx) { this.ctx = ctx; } public void sendEmail(String address, String text) { if (blackList.contains(address)) { BlackListEvent event = new BlackListEvent(address, text); ctx.publishEvent(event); return; } // send email... } } public class BlackListNotifier implements ApplicationListener { private String notificationAddress; public void setNotificationAddress(String notificationAddress) { this.notificationAddress = notificationAddress; } public void onApplicationEvent(ApplicationEvent event) { if (event instanceof BlackListEvent) { // notify appropriate person... } } } Of course, this particular example could probably be implemented in better ways (perhaps by using AOP features), but it should be sufficient to illustrate the basic event mechanism.

For optimal usage and understanding of application contexts, users should generally familiarize themselves with Spring's Resource abstraction, as described in the chapter entitled . An application context is a ResourceLoader, able to be used to load Resources. A Resource is essentially a java.net.URL on steroids (in fact, it just wraps and uses a URL where appropriate), which can be used to obtain low-level resources from almost any location in a transparent fashion, including from the classpath, a filesystem location, anywhere describable with a standard URL, and some other variations. If the resource location string is a simple path without any special prefixes, where those resources come from is specific and appropriate to the actual application context type. A bean deployed into the application context may implement the special callback interface, ResourceLoaderAware, to be automatically called back at initialization time with the application context itself passed in as the ResourceLoader. A bean may also expose properties of type Resource, to be used to access static resources, and expect that they will be injected into it like any other properties. The person deploying the bean may specify those Resource properties as simple String paths, and rely on a special JavaBean PropertyEditor that is automatically registered by the context, to convert those text strings to actual Resource objects. The location path or paths supplied to an ApplicationContext constructor are actually resource strings, and in simple form are treated appropriately to the specific context implementation ( ClassPathXmlApplicationContext treats a simple location path as a classpath location), but may also be used with special prefixes to force loading of definitions from the classpath or a URL, regardless of the actual context type.

ApplicationContext instances can be created declaratively using for example a ContextLoader. Of course you can also create ApplicationContext instances programmatically using one of the ApplicationContext implementations. First, let's examine the ContextLoader mechanism and its implementations. The ContextLoader mechanism comes in two flavors: the ContextLoaderListener and the ContextLoaderServlet. They both have the same functionality but differ in that the listener version cannot be reliably used in Servlet 2.3 containers. Since the Servlet 2.4 specification, servlet context listeners are required to execute immediately after the servlet context for the web application has been created and is available to service the first request (and also when the servlet context is about to be shut down): as such a servlet context listener is an ideal place to initialize the Spring ApplicationContext. It is up to you as to which one you use, but all things being equal you should probably prefer ContextLoaderListener; for more information on compatibility, have a look at the Javadoc for the ContextLoaderServlet. You can register an ApplicationContext using the ContextLoaderListener as follows: <context-param> <param-name>contextConfigLocation</param-name> <param-value>/WEB-INF/daoContext.xml /WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml</param-value> </context-param> <listener> <listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener</listener-class> </listener> <!-- or use the ContextLoaderServlet instead of the above listener <servlet> <servlet-name>context</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderServlet</servlet-class> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> </servlet> --> The listener inspects the 'contextConfigLocation' parameter. If the parameter does not exist, the listener will use /WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml as a default. When it does exist, it will separate the String using predefined delimiters (comma, semicolon and whitespace) and use the values as locations where application contexts will be searched for. Ant-style path patterns are supported as well: e.g. /WEB-INF/*Context.xml (for all files whose name ends with "Context.xml", residing in the "WEB-INF" directory) or /WEB-INF/**/*Context.xml (for all such files in any subdirectory of "WEB-INF"). The ContextLoaderServlet can be used instead of the ContextLoaderListener. The servlet will use the 'contextConfigLocation' parameter just as the listener does.

Since Spring 2.5, it is possible to deploy a Spring ApplicationContext as a RAR file, encapsulating the context and all of its required bean classes and library JARs in a J2EE RAR deployment unit. This is the equivalent of bootstrapping a standalone ApplicationContext, just hosted in J2EE environment, being able to access the J2EE server's facilities. RAR deployment is intended as a more 'natural' alternative to the not uncommon scenario of deploying a headless WAR file - i.e. a WAR file without any HTTP entry points, just used for bootstrapping a Spring ApplicationContext in a J2EE environment. RAR deployment is ideal for application contexts that do not need any HTTP entry points but rather just consist of message endpoints and scheduled jobs etc. Beans in such a context may use application server resources such as the JTA transaction manager and JNDI-bound JDBC DataSources and JMS ConnectionFactory instances, and may also register with the platform's JMX server - all through Spring's standard transaction management and JNDI and JMX support facilities. Application components may also interact with the application's server JCA WorkManager through Spring's TaskExecutor abstraction. Check out the JavaDoc of the SpringContextResourceAdapter class for the configuration details involved in RAR deployment. For simple deployment needs, all you need to do is the following: Package all application classes into a RAR file (which is just a standard JAR file with a different file extension), add all required library jars into the root of the RAR archive, add a "META-INF/ra.xml" deployment descriptor (as shown in SpringContextResourceAdapter's JavaDoc) as well as the corresponding Spring XML bean definition file(s) (typically "META-INF/applicationContext.xml"), and drop the resulting RAR file into your application server's deployment directory! NOTE: Such RAR deployment units are usually self-contained; they do not expose components to the 'outside' world, not even to other modules of the same application. Interaction with a RAR-based ApplicationContext usually happens through JMS destinations that it shares with other modules. A RAR-based ApplicationContext may also - for example - schedule some jobs, reacting to new files in the file system (or the like). If it actually needs to allow for synchronous access from the outside, it could for example export RMI endpoints, which of course may be used by other application modules on the same machine as well.

As mentioned in the section entitled , using a BeanPostProcessor in conjunction with annotations is a common means of extending the Spring IoC container. For example, Spring 2.0 introduced the possibility of enforcing required properties with the @Required annotation. As of Spring 2.5, it is now possible to follow that same general approach to drive Spring's dependency injection. Essentially, the @Autowired annotation provides the same capabilities as described in but with more fine-grained control and wider applicability. Spring 2.5 also adds support for JSR-250 annotations such as @Resource, @PostConstruct, and @PreDestroy. Use of these annotations also requires that certain BeanPostProcessors be registered within the Spring container. As always, these can be registered as individual bean definitions, but they can also be implicitly registered by including the following tag in an XML-based Spring configuration (notice the inclusion of the 'context' namespace): <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd"> <context:annotation-config/> </beans> (The implicitly registered post-processors include AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor, CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor, PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor, as well as the aforementioned RequiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.) Note that <context:annotation-config/> only looks for annotations on beans in the same application context it is defined in. This means that, if you put <context:annotation-config/> in a WebApplicationContext for a DispatcherServlet, it only checks for @Autowired beans in your controllers, and not your services. See for more information.

The @Required annotation applies to bean property setter methods, as in the following example: public class SimpleMovieLister { private MovieFinder movieFinder; @Required public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } // ... } This annotation simply indicates that the affected bean property must be populated at configuration time: either through an explicit property value in a bean definition or through autowiring. The container will throw an exception if the affected bean property has not been populated; this allows for eager and explicit failure, avoiding NullPointerExceptions or the like later on. Note that it is still recommended to put assertions into the bean class itself (for example into an init method) in order to enforce those required references and values even when using the class outside of a container.

As expected, the @Autowired annotation may be applied to "traditional" setter methods: public class SimpleMovieLister { private MovieFinder movieFinder; @Autowired public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } // ... } The annotation may also be applied to methods with arbitrary names and/or multiple arguments: public class MovieRecommender { private MovieCatalog movieCatalog; private CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao; @Autowired public void prepare(MovieCatalog movieCatalog, CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) { this.movieCatalog = movieCatalog; this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao; } // ... } The @Autowired annotation may even be applied on constructors and fields: public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired private MovieCatalog movieCatalog; private CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao; @Autowired public MovieRecommender(CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) { this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao; } // ... } It is also possible to provide all beans of a particular type from the ApplicationContext by adding the annotation to a field or method that expects an array of that type: public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired private MovieCatalog[] movieCatalogs; // ... } The same applies for typed collections: public class MovieRecommender { private Set<MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs; @Autowired public void setMovieCatalogs(Set<MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs) { this.movieCatalogs = movieCatalogs; } // ... } Even typed Maps may be autowired as long as the expected key type is String. The Map values will contain all beans of the expected type, and the keys will contain the corresponding bean names: public class MovieRecommender { private Map<String, MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs; @Autowired public void setMovieCatalogs(Map<String, MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs) { this.movieCatalogs = movieCatalogs; } // ... } By default, the autowiring will fail whenever zero candidate beans are available; the default behavior is to treat annotated methods, constructors, and fields as indicating required dependencies. This behavior can be changed as demonstrated below. public class SimpleMovieLister { private MovieFinder movieFinder; @Autowired(required=false) public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } // ... } Only one annotated constructor per-class may be marked as required, but multiple non-required constructors can be annotated. In that case, each will be considered among the candidates and Spring will use the greediest constructor whose dependencies can be satisfied. Prefer the use of @Autowired's required attribute over the @Required annotation. The required attribute indicates that the property is not required for autowiring purposes, simply skipping it if it cannot be autowired. @Required, on the other hand, is stronger in that it enforces the property to have been set in any of the container's supported ways; if no value has been injected, a corresponding exception will be raised. @Autowired may also be used for well-known "resolvable dependencies": the BeanFactory interface, the ApplicationContext interface, the ResourceLoader interface, the ApplicationEventPublisher interface and the MessageSource interface. These interfaces (and their extended interfaces such as ConfigurableApplicationContext or ResourcePatternResolver) will be automatically resolved, with no special setup necessary. public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired private ApplicationContext context; public MovieRecommender() { } // ... }

Since autowiring by type may lead to multiple candidates, it is often necessary to have more control over the selection process. One way to accomplish this is with Spring's @Qualifier annotation. This allows for associating qualifier values with specific arguments, narrowing the set of type matches so that a specific bean is chosen for each argument. In the simplest case, this can be a plain descriptive value: public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired @Qualifier("main") private MovieCatalog movieCatalog; // ... } The @Qualifier annotation can also be specified on individual constructor arguments or method parameters: public class MovieRecommender { private MovieCatalog movieCatalog; private CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao; @Autowired public void prepare(@Qualifier("main") MovieCatalog movieCatalog, CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) { this.movieCatalog = movieCatalog; this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao; } // ... } The corresponding bean definitions would look like as follows. The bean with qualifier value "main" would be wired with the constructor argument that has been qualified with the same value. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd"> <context:annotation-config/> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier value="main"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier value="action"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean id="movieRecommender" class="example.MovieRecommender"/> </beans> For a fallback match, the bean name is considered as a default qualifier value. This means that the bean may be defined with an id "main" instead of the nested qualifier element, leading to the same matching result. However, note that while this can be used to refer to specific beans by name, @Autowired is fundamentally about type-driven injection with optional semantic qualifiers. This means that qualifier values, even when using the bean name fallback, always have narrowing semantics within the set of type matches; they do not semantically express a reference to a unique bean id. Good qualifier values would be "main" or "EMEA" or "persistent", expressing characteristics of a specific component - independent from the bean id (which may be auto-generated in case of an anonymous bean definition like the one above). Qualifiers also apply to typed collections (as discussed above): e.g. to Set<MovieCatalog>. In such a case, all matching beans according to the declared qualifiers are going to be injected as a collection. This implies that qualifiers do not have to be unique; they rather simply constitute filtering criteria. For example, there could be multiple MovieCatalog beans defined with the same qualifier value "action"; all of which would be injected into a Set<MovieCatalog> annotated with @Qualifier("action"). If you intend to express annotation-driven injection by name, do not primarily use @Autowired - even if is technically capable of referring to a bean name through @Qualifier values. Instead, prefer the JSR-250 @Resource annotation which is semantically defined to identify a specific target component by its unique name, with the declared type being irrelevant for the matching process. As a specific consequence of this semantic difference, beans which are themselves defined as a collection or map type cannot be injected via @Autowired since type matching is not properly applicable to them. Use @Resource for such beans, referring to the specific collection/map bean by unique name. Note: In contrast to @Autowired which is applicable to fields, constructors and multi-argument methods (allowing for narrowing through qualifier annotations at the parameter level), @Resource is only supported for fields and bean property setter methods with a single argument. As a consequence, stick with qualifiers if your injection target is a constructor or a multi-argument method. You may create your own custom qualifier annotations as well. Simply define an annotation and provide the @Qualifier annotation within your definition: @Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Qualifier public @interface Genre { String value(); } Then you can provide the custom qualifier on autowired fields and parameters: public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired @Genre("Action") private MovieCatalog actionCatalog; private MovieCatalog comedyCatalog; @Autowired public void setComedyCatalog(@Genre("Comedy") MovieCatalog comedyCatalog) { this.comedyCatalog = comedyCatalog; } // ... } The next step is to provide the information on the candidate bean definitions. You can add <qualifier/> tags as sub-elements of the <bean/> tag and then specify the 'type' and 'value' to match your custom qualifier annotations. The type will be matched against the fully-qualified class name of the annotation, or as a convenience when there is no risk of conflicting names, you may use the 'short' class name. Both are demonstrated in the following example. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd"> <context:annotation-config/> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier type="Genre" value="Action"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier type="example.Genre" value="Comedy"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean id="movieRecommender" class="example.MovieRecommender"/> </beans> In the next section, entitled , you will see an annotation-based alternative to providing the qualifier metadata in XML. Specifically, see: . In some cases, it may be sufficient to use an annotation without a value. This may be useful when the annotation serves a more generic purpose and could be applied across several different types of dependencies. For example, you may provide an offline catalog that would be searched when no Internet connection is available. First define the simple annotation: @Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Qualifier public @interface Offline { } Then add the annotation to the field or property to be autowired: public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired @Offline private MovieCatalog offlineCatalog; // ... } Now the bean definition only needs a qualifier 'type': <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier type="Offline"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> It is also possible to define custom qualifier annotations that accept named attributes in addition to or instead of the simple 'value' attribute. If multiple attribute values are then specified on a field or parameter to be autowired, a bean definition must match all such attribute values to be considered an autowire candidate. As an example, consider the following annotation definition: @Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Qualifier public @interface MovieQualifier { String genre(); Format format(); } In this case Format is an enum: public enum Format { VHS, DVD, BLURAY } The fields to be autowired are annotated with the custom qualifier and include values for both attributes: 'genre' and 'format'. public class MovieRecommender { @Autowired @MovieQualifier(format=Format.VHS, genre="Action") private MovieCatalog actionVhsCatalog; @Autowired @MovieQualifier(format=Format.VHS, genre="Comedy") private MovieCatalog comedyVhsCatalog; @Autowired @MovieQualifier(format=Format.DVD, genre="Action") private MovieCatalog actionDvdCatalog; @Autowired @MovieQualifier(format=Format.BLURAY, genre="Comedy") private MovieCatalog comedyBluRayCatalog; // ... } Finally, the bean definitions should contain matching qualifier values. This example also demonstrates that bean meta attributes may be used instead of the <qualifier/> sub-elements. If available, the <qualifier/> and its attributes would take precedence, but the autowiring mechanism will fallback on the values provided within the <meta/> tags if no such qualifier is present (see the last 2 bean definitions below). <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd"> <context:annotation-config/> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier type="MovieQualifier"> <attribute key="format" value="VHS"/> <attribute key="genre" value="Action"/> </qualifier> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <qualifier type="MovieQualifier"> <attribute key="format" value="VHS"/> <attribute key="genre" value="Comedy"/> </qualifier> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <meta key="format" value="DVD"/> <meta key="genre" value="Action"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> <bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog"> <meta key="format" value="BLURAY"/> <meta key="genre" value="Comedy"/> <!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean --> </bean> </beans>

The CustomAutowireConfigurer is a BeanFactoryPostProcessor that enables further customization of the autowiring process. Specifically, it allows you to register your own custom qualifier annotation types even if they are not themselves annotated with Spring's @Qualifier annotation. <bean id="customAutowireConfigurer" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.CustomAutowireConfigurer"> <property name="customQualifierTypes"> <set> <value>example.CustomQualifier</value> </set> </property> </bean> Note that the particular implementation of AutowireCandidateResolver that will be activated for the application context depends upon the Java version. If running on less than Java 5, the qualifier annotations are not supported, and therefore autowire candidates are solely determined by the 'autowire-candidate' value of each bean definition as well as any 'default-autowire-candidates' pattern(s) available on the <beans/> element. If running on Java 5 or greater, the presence of @Qualifier annotations or any custom annotations registered with the CustomAutowireConfigurer will also play a role. Regardless of the Java version, the determination of a "primary" candidate (when multiple beans qualify as autowire candidates) is the same: if exactly one bean definition among the candidates has a 'primary' attribute set to 'true', it will be selected.

Spring also supports injection using the JSR-250 @Resource annotation on fields or bean property setter methods. This is a common pattern found in Java EE 5 and Java 6 (e.g. in JSF 1.2 managed beans or JAX-WS 2.0 endpoints), which Spring supports for Spring-managed objects as well. @Resource takes a 'name' attribute, and by default Spring will interpret that value as the bean name to be injected. In other words, it follows by-name semantics as demonstrated in this example: public class SimpleMovieLister { private MovieFinder movieFinder; @Resource(name="myMovieFinder") public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } } If no name is specified explicitly, then the default name will be derived from the name of the field or setter method: In case of a field, it will simply be equivalent to the field name; in case of a setter method, it will be equivalent to the bean property name. So the following example is going to have the bean with name "movieFinder" injected into its setter method: public class SimpleMovieLister { private MovieFinder movieFinder; @Resource public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } } The name provided with the annotation will be resolved as a bean name by the ApplicationContext of which the CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor is aware. Note that the names may be resolved via JNDI if Spring's SimpleJndiBeanFactory is configured explicitly. However, it is recommended to rely on the default behavior and simply use Spring's JNDI lookup capabilities to preserve the level of indirection. Similar to @Autowired, @Resource may fall back to standard bean type matches (i.e. find a primary type match instead of a specific named bean) as well as resolve well-known "resolvable dependencies": the BeanFactory interface, the ApplicationContext interface, the ResourceLoader interface, the ApplicationEventPublisher interface and the MessageSource interface. Note that this only applies to @Resource usage with no explicit name specified! So the following example will have its customerPreferenceDao field looking for a bean with name "customerPreferenceDao" first, then falling back to a primary type match for the type CustomerPreferenceDao. The "context" field will simply be injected based on the known resolvable dependency type ApplicationContext. public class MovieRecommender { @Resource private CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao; @Resource private ApplicationContext context; public MovieRecommender() { } // ... }

The CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor not only recognizes the @Resource annotation but also the JSR-250 lifecycle annotations. Introduced in Spring 2.5, the support for these annotations offers yet another alternative to those described in the sections on initialization callbacks and destruction callbacks. Provided that the CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor is registered within the Spring ApplicationContext, a method carrying one of these annotations will be invoked at the same point in the lifecycle as the corresponding Spring lifecycle interface's method or explicitly declared callback method. In the example below, the cache will be pre-populated upon initialization and cleared upon destruction. public class CachingMovieLister { @PostConstruct public void populateMovieCache() { // populates the movie cache upon initialization... } @PreDestroy public void clearMovieCache() { // clears the movie cache upon destruction... } } For details regarding the effects of combining various lifecycle mechanisms, see .

Thus far most of the examples within this chapter have used XML for specifying the configuration metadata that produces each BeanDefinition within the Spring container. The previous section () demonstrated the possibility of providing a considerable amount of the configuration metadata using source-level annotations. Even in those examples however, the "base" bean definitions were explicitly defined in the XML file while the annotations were driving the dependency injection only. The current section introduces an option for implicitly detecting the candidate components by scanning the classpath and matching against filters. Starting with Spring 3.0 many of the features provided by the Spring JavaConfig project have been added to the core Spring Framework. This allows you to define beans using Java rather than using the traditional XML files. Take a look at the @Configuration, @Bean, @Import and @DependsOn annotations for how to use these new features.

Beginning with Spring 2.0, the @Repository annotation was introduced as a marker for any class that fulfills the role or stereotype of a repository (a.k.a. Data Access Object or DAO). Among the possibilities for leveraging such a marker is the automatic translation of exceptions as described in . Spring 2.5 introduces further stereotype annotations: @Component, @Service and @Controller. @Component serves as a generic stereotype for any Spring-managed component; whereas, @Repository, @Service, and @Controller serve as specializations of @Component for more specific use cases (e.g., in the persistence, service, and presentation layers, respectively). What this means is that you can annotate your component classes with @Component, but by annotating them with @Repository, @Service, or @Controller instead, your classes are more properly suited for processing by tools or associating with aspects. For example, these stereotype annotations make ideal targets for pointcuts. Of course, it is also possible that @Repository, @Service, and @Controller may carry additional semantics in future releases of the Spring Framework. Thus, if you are making a decision between using @Component or @Service for your service layer, @Service is clearly the better choice. Similarly, as stated above, @Repository is already supported as a marker for automatic exception translation in your persistence layer.

Spring provides the capability of automatically detecting 'stereotyped' classes and registering corresponding BeanDefinitions with the ApplicationContext. For example, the following two classes are eligible for such autodetection: @Service public class SimpleMovieLister { private MovieFinder movieFinder; @Autowired public SimpleMovieLister(MovieFinder movieFinder) { this.movieFinder = movieFinder; } } @Repository public class JpaMovieFinder implements MovieFinder { // implementation elided for clarity } To autodetect these classes and register the corresponding beans requires the inclusion of the following element in XML where 'basePackage' would be a common parent package for the two classes (or alternatively a comma-separated list could be specified that included the parent package of each class). <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd"> <context:component-scan base-package="org.example"/> </beans> Note that the scanning of classpath packages requires the presence of corresponding directory entries in the classpath. When building jars with Ant, make sure to not activate the files-only switch of the jar task! Furthermore, the AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor and CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor are both included implicitly when using the component-scan element. That means that the two components are autodetected and wired together - all without any bean configuration metadata provided in XML. The registration of those post-processors can be disabled by including the annotation-config attribute with a value of 'false'.

By default, classes annotated with @Component, @Repository, @Service, or @Controller (or classes annotated with a custom annotation that itself is annotated with @Component) are the only detected candidate components. However it is simple to modify and extend this behavior by applying custom filters. These can be added as either include-filter or exclude-filter sub-elements of the 'component-scan' element. Each filter element requires the 'type' and 'expression' attributes. Five filtering options exist as described below. Filter Type Example Expression Description annotation org.example.SomeAnnotation An annotation to be present at the type level in target components. assignable org.example.SomeClass A class (or interface) that the target components are assignable to (extend/implement). aspectj org.example..*Service+ An AspectJ type expression to be matched by the target components. regex org\.example\.Default.* A regex expression to be matched by the target components' class names. custom org.example.MyCustomTypeFilter A custom implementation of the org.springframework.core.type.TypeFilter interface. Find below an example of the XML configuration for ignoring all @Repository annotations and using "stub" repositories instead. <beans ...> <context:component-scan base-package="org.example"> <context:include-filter type="regex" expression=".*Stub.*Repository"/> <context:exclude-filter type="annotation" expression="org.springframework.stereotype.Repository"/> </context:component-scan> </beans> It is also possible to disable the default filters by providing use-default-filters="false" as an attribute of the <component-scan/> element. This will in effect disable automatic detection of classes annotated with @Component, @Repository, @Service, or @Controller.

Spring components can also contribute bean definition metadata to the container. This is done with the same @Bean annotation used to define bean metadata within @Configuration annotated classes. Here is a simple example @Component public class FactoryMethodComponent { @Bean @Qualifier("public") public TestBean publicInstance() { return new TestBean("publicInstance"); } public void DoWork() { // Component method implementation omitted } } This class is a Spring component and has application specific code contained in its DoWork method. However, it also contributes a bean definition that has a factory method referring to the method publicInstance. The @Bean annotation identifies the factory method and also other bean definition properties, such as a qualifier value via the @Qualifier annotation. Other method level annotations that can be specified are @Scope, @Lazy, and custom qualifier annotations. Autowired fields and methods are supported as before with the additional support for autowiring of @Bean methods, as shown in the example below @Component public class FactoryMethodComponent { private static int i; @Bean @Qualifier("public") public TestBean publicInstance() { return new TestBean("publicInstance"); } // use of a custom qualifier and autowiring of method parameters @Bean @BeanAge(1) protected TestBean protectedInstance(@Qualifier("public") TestBean spouse, @Value("#{privateInstance.age}") String country) { TestBean tb = new TestBean("protectedInstance", 1); tb.setSpouse(tb); tb.setCountry(country); return tb; } @Bean @Scope(StandardScopes.PROTOTYPE) private TestBean privateInstance() { return new TestBean("privateInstance", i++); } @Bean @Scope(value = StandardScopes.SESSION, proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS) public TestBean requestScopedInstance() { return new TestBean("requestScopedInstance", 3); } } Note the use of autowiring of the String method parameter country to the value of the Age property on another bean named privateInstance. A Spring Expression Language element is used to define the value of the property via the notation #{ <expression> }. For @Value annotations, an expression resolver is preconfigured to look for bean names when resolving expression text. The @Bean methods in a Spring component are processed differently than their counterparts inside a Spring @Configuration class. The difference is that @Component classes are not enhanced with CGLIB to intercept the invocation of methods and fields. CGLIB proxying is the means by which invoking methods or fields within @Configuration classes' @Bean methods create bean metadata references to collaborating objects and do not invoke the method with normal Java semantics. In contrast, calling a method or field within a @Component classes' @Bean method has standard Java semantics.

When a component is autodetected as part of the scanning process, its bean name will be generated by the BeanNameGenerator strategy known to that scanner. By default, any Spring 'stereotype' annotation (@Component, @Repository, @Service, and @Controller) that contains a name value will thereby provide that name to the corresponding bean definition. If such an annotation contains no name value or for any other detected component (such as those discovered due to custom filters), the default bean name generator will return the uncapitalized non-qualified class name. For example, if the following two components were detected, the names would be 'myMovieLister' and 'movieFinderImpl': @Service("myMovieLister") public class SimpleMovieLister { // ... } @Repository public class MovieFinderImpl implements MovieFinder { // ... } If you don't want to rely on the default bean-naming strategy, you may provide a custom bean-naming strategy. First, implement the BeanNameGenerator interface, and be sure to include a default no-arg constructor. Then, provide the fully-qualified class name when configuring the scanner: <beans ...> <context:component-scan base-package="org.example" name-generator="org.example.MyNameGenerator" /> </beans> As a general rule, consider specifying the name with the annotation whenever other components may be making explicit references to it. On the other hand, the auto-generated names are adequate whenever the container is responsible for wiring.

As with Spring-managed components in general, the default and by far most common scope is 'singleton'. However, there are times when other scopes are needed. Therefore Spring 2.5 introduces a new @Scope annotation as well. Simply provide the name of the scope within the annotation, such as: @Scope(StandardScopes.PROTOTYPE) @Repository public class MovieFinderImpl implements MovieFinder { // ... } If you would like to provide a custom strategy for scope resolution rather than relying on the annotation-based approach, implement the ScopeMetadataResolver interface, and be sure to include a default no-arg constructor. Then, provide the fully-qualified class name when configuring the scanner: <beans ...> <context:component-scan base-package="org.example" scope-resolver="org.example.MyScopeResolver" /> </beans> When using certain non-singleton scopes, it may be necessary to generate proxies for the scoped objects. The reasoning is described in detail within the section entitled . For this purpose, a scoped-proxy attribute is available on the 'component-scan' element. The three possible values are: 'no', 'interfaces', and 'targetClass'. For example, the following configuration will result in standard JDK dynamic proxies: <beans ...> <context:component-scan base-package="org.example" scoped-proxy="interfaces" /> </beans>

The @Qualifier annotation was introduced in the section above entitled . The examples in that section demonstrated use of the @Qualifier annotation as well as custom qualifier annotations to provide fine-grained control when resolving autowire candidates. Since those examples were based on XML bean definitions, the qualifier metadata was provided on the candidate bean definitions using the 'qualifier' or 'meta' sub-elements of the 'bean' element in the XML. When relying upon classpath scanning for autodetection of components, then the qualifier metadata may be provided with type-level annotations on the candidate class. The following three examples demonstrate this technique. @Component @Qualifier("Action") public class ActionMovieCatalog implements MovieCatalog { // ... } @Component @Genre("Action") public class ActionMovieCatalog implements MovieCatalog { // ... } @Component @Offline public class CachingMovieCatalog implements MovieCatalog { // ... } As with most of the annotation-based alternatives, keep in mind that the annotation metadata is bound to the class definition itself, while the use of XML allows for multiple beans of the same type to provide variations in their qualifier metadata since that metadata is provided per-instance rather than per-class.

The central artifact in Spring's new Java-configuration support is the @Configuration-annotated class. These classes consist principally of @Bean-annotated methods that define instantiation, configuration, and initialization logic for objects that will be managed by the Spring IoC container. Annotating a class with the @Configuration indicates that the class may be used by the Spring IoC container as a source of bean definitions. The simplest possible @Configuration class would read as follows: @Configuration public class AppConfig { } An application may make use of one @Configuration-annotated class, or many. @Configuration is meta-annotated as a @Component, therefore Configuration-classes are candidates for component-scanning and may also take advantage of @Autowired annotations at the field and method level but not at the constructor level. Configuration-classes must also have a default constructor. Externalized values may be wired into Configuration-classes using the @Value annotation.

@Bean is a method-level annotation and a direct analog of the XML <bean/> element. The annotation supports some of the attributes offered by <bean/>, such as: init-method, destroy-method, autowiring and name. You can use the @Bean annotation in a Configuration-class or in a Component-class.

To declare a bean, simply annotate a method with the @Bean annotation. Such a method will be used to register a bean definition within a ApplicationContext of the type specified as the methods return value. By default, the bean name will be the same as the method name (see bean naming for details on how to customize this behavior). The following is a simple example of a @Bean method declaration: @Configuration public class AppConfig { @Bean public TransferService transferService() { return new TransferServiceImpl(); } } For comparison sake, the configuration above is exactly equivalent to the following Spring XML: <beans> <bean name="transferService" class="com.acme.TransferServiceImpl"/> </beans> Both will result in a bean named transferService being available in the ApplicationContext, bound to an object instance of type TransferServiceImpl: transferService -> com.acme.TransferServiceImpl

When @Beans have dependencies on one another, expressing that dependency is as simple as having one bean method call another: @Configuration public class AppConfig { @Bean public Foo foo() { return new Foo(bar()); } @Bean public Bar bar() { return new Bar(); } } In the example above, the foo bean recevies a reference to bar via constructor injection.

Beans created in a Configuration-class supports the regular lifecycle callbacks. Any classes defined with the @Bean annotation can use the @PostConstruct and @PreDestroy annotations from JSR-250, see the section on JSR-250 annotations for further details. The regular Spring lifecycle callbacks are fully supported as well. If a bean implements InitializingBean, DisposableBean, or Lifecycle, their respective methods will be called by the container. The standard set of *Aware interfaces such as BeanFactoryAware, BeanNameAware, MessageSourceAware, ApplicationContextAware, etc. are also fully supported. The @Bean annotation supports specifying arbitrary initialization and destruction callback methods, much like Spring XML's init-method and destroy-method attributes to the bean element: public class Foo { public void init() { // initialization logic } } public class Bar { public void cleanup() { // destruction logic } } @Configuration public class AppConfig { @Bean(initMethodName = "init") public Foo foo() { return new Foo(); } @Bean(destroyMethodName="cleanup") public Bar bar() { return new Bar(); } } Of course, in the case of Foo above, it would be equally as valid to call the init() method directly during construction: @Configuration public class AppConfig { @Bean public Foo foo() { Foo foo = new Foo(); foo.init(); return foo; } // ... } Remember that because you are working directly in Java, you can do anything you like with your objects, and do not always need to rely on the container!

You can specify that your beans defined with the @Bean annotation should have a specific scope. You can use any of the standard scopes specified in the Bean Scopes section. The default scope is "singleton", but this can be overridden by using the @Scope annotation: @Configuration public class MyConfiguration { @Bean @Scope("prototype") public Encryptor encryptor() { // ... } }

Spring offers a convenient way of working with scoped dependencies through scoped proxies. The easiest way to create such a proxy when using the XML configuration is the <aop:scoped-proxy/> element. Configuring your beans in Java with a @Scope annotation offers equivalent support with the proxyMode attribute. The default is no proxy (ScopedProxyMode.NO) but you can specify ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS or ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES. If we were to port the XML reference documentation scoped proxy example (see link above) to our @Bean using Java, it would look like the following: // an HTTP Session-scoped bean exposed as a proxy @Bean @Scope(value = "session", proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS) public UserPreferences userPreferences() { return new UserPreferences(); } @Bean public Service userService() { UserService service = new SimpleUserService(); // a reference to the proxied 'userPreferences' bean service.seUserPreferences(userPreferences()); return service; }

As noted earlier, lookup method injection is an advanced feature that should be comparatively rarely used. It is useful in cases where a singleton-scoped bean has a dependency on a prototype-scoped bean. Using Java for this type of configuration provides a natural means for implementing this pattern. public abstract class CommandManager { public Object process(Object commandState) { // grab a new instance of the appropriate Command interface Command command = createCommand(); // set the state on the (hopefully brand new) Command instance command.setState(commandState); return command.execute(); } // okay... but where is the implementation of this method? protected abstract Command createCommand(); } Using Java-configuration support we can easily create a subclass of CommandManager where the abstract createCommand() method is overridden in such a way that it 'looks up' a brand new (prototype) command object: @Bean @Scope("prototype") public AsyncCommand asyncCommand() { AsyncCommand command = new AsyncCommand(); // inject dependencies here as required return command; } @Bean public CommandManager commandManager() { // return new anonymous implementation of CommandManager with command() overridden // to return a new prototype Command object return new CommandManager() { protected Command command() { return asyncCommand(); } } }

By default, Configuration-classes uses a @Bean method's name as the name of the resulting bean. This functionality can be overridden, however, using the name attribute. @Configuration public class AppConfig { @Bean(name = "bar") public Foo foo() { return new Foo(); } }

The BeanFactory provides the underlying basis for Spring's IoC functionality but it is only used directly in integration with other third-party frameworks and is now largely historical in nature for most users of Spring. The BeanFactory and related interfaces, such as BeanFactoryAware, InitializingBean, DisposableBean, are still present in Spring for the purposes of backward compatibility with the large number of third-party frameworks that integrate with Spring. Often third-party components that can not use more modern equivalents such as @PostConstruct or @PreDestroy in order to remain compatible with JDK 1.4 or avoid a dependency on JSR-250. This section provides some additional background into the differences between the BeanFactory and ApplicationContext and how one might access the IoC container directly via a 'classic' singleton lookup.

Short version: use an ApplicationContext unless you have a really good reason for not doing so. For those of you that are looking for slightly more depth as to the 'but why' of the above recommendation, keep reading. As the ApplicationContext includes all functionality of the BeanFactory, it is generally recommended that it be used in preference to the BeanFactory, except for a few limited situations such as in an Applet, where memory consumption might be critical and a few extra kilobytes might make a difference. However, for most 'typical' enterprise applications and systems, the ApplicationContext is what you will want to use. Versions of Spring 2.0 and above make heavy use of the BeanPostProcessor extension point (to effect proxying and suchlike), and if you are using just a plain BeanFactory then a fair amount of support such as transactions and AOP will not take effect (at least not without some extra steps on your part), which could be confusing because nothing will actually be wrong with the configuration. Find below a feature matrix that lists what features are provided by the BeanFactory and ApplicationContext interfaces and implementations. Feature BeanFactory ApplicationContext Bean instantiation/wiring Yes Yes Automatic BeanPostProcessor registration No Yes Automatic BeanFactoryPostProcessor registration No Yes Convenient MessageSource access (for i18n) No Yes ApplicationEvent publication No Yes To explicitly register a bean post-processor when using a BeanFactory implementation you will need to write code like this: ConfigurableBeanFactory factory = new XmlBeanFactory(...); // now register any needed BeanPostProcessor instances MyBeanPostProcessor postProcessor = new MyBeanPostProcessor(); factory.addBeanPostProcessor(postProcessor); // now start using the factory This explicit registration step is not convenient, and this is one of the reasons why the various ApplicationContext implementations are preferred above plain BeanFactory implementations in the vast majority of Spring-backed applications, especially when using BeanPostProcessors. To explicitly register a BeanFactoryPostProcessor when using a BeanFactory implementation you will need to write code like this: XmlBeanFactory factory = new XmlBeanFactory(new FileSystemResource("beans.xml")); // bring in some property values from a Properties file PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer cfg = new PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer(); cfg.setLocation(new FileSystemResource("jdbc.properties")); // now actually do the replacement cfg.postProcessBeanFactory(factory); In both cases, the explicit registration step is not convenient, and this is one of the reasons why the various ApplicationContext implementations are preferred above plain BeanFactory implementations in the vast majority of Spring-backed applications, especially when using BeanFactoryPostProcessors and BeanPostProcessors, which are the mechanisms by which important functionality such as property placeholder replacement and AOP are implemented.

The majority of the code inside an application is best written in a DI style, where that code is served out of a Spring IoC container, has its own dependencies supplied by the container when it is created, and is completely unaware of the container. However, for the small glue layers of code that are sometimes needed to tie other code together, there is sometimes a need for singleton (or quasi-singleton) style access to a Spring IoC container. For example, third party code may try to construct new objects directly (Class.forName() style), without the ability to force it to get these objects out of a Spring IoC container. If the object constructed by the third party code is just a small stub or proxy, which then uses a singleton style access to a Spring IoC container to get a real object to delegate to, then inversion of control has still been achieved for the majority of the code (the object coming out of the container); thus most code is still unaware of the container or how it is accessed, and remains decoupled from other code, with all ensuing benefits. EJBs may also use this stub/proxy approach to delegate to a plain Java implementation object, coming out of a Spring IoC container. While the Spring IoC container itself ideally does not have to be a singleton, it may be unrealistic in terms of memory usage or initialization times (when using beans in the Spring IoC container such as a Hibernate SessionFactory) for each bean to use its own, non-singleton Spring IoC container. Looking up the application context in a service locator style is sometimes the only option you have to access shared Spring managed components, such as in an EJB 2.1 environment, or you want to share a single ApplicationContext as a parent to WebApplicationContexts across war files. In this case you should look into using the utility class ContextSingletonBeanFactoryLocator locator that is described in this SpringSource team blog entry.

The context namespace introduced in Spring 2.5 provides a load-time-weaver element. <beans ...> <context:load-time-weaver/> </beans> Adding this element to an XML-based Spring configuration file activates a Spring LoadTimeWeaver for the ApplicationContext. Any bean within that ApplicationContext may implement LoadTimeWeaverAware thereby receiving a reference to the load-time weaver instance. This is particularly useful in combination with Spring's JPA support where load-time weaving may be necessary for JPA class transformation. Consult the LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean Javadoc for more detail. For more on AspectJ load-time weaving, see .