Polish reference documentation

framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/beans/annotation-config/autowired-qualifiers.adoc

@@ -167,19 +167,19 @@ therefore recommendable for your parameter names to match the target bean names.
 As an alternative for injection by name, consider the JSR-250 `@Resource` annotation
 which is semantically defined to identify a specific target component by its unique name,
 with the declared type being irrelevant for the matching process. `@Autowired` has rather
-different semantics: After selecting candidate beans by type, the specified `String`
+different semantics: after selecting candidate beans by type, the specified `String`
 qualifier value is considered within those type-selected candidates only (for example,
 matching an `account` qualifier against beans marked with the same qualifier label).
 
 For beans that are themselves defined as a collection, `Map`, or array type, `@Resource`
 is a fine solution, referring to the specific collection or array bean by unique name.
-That said, as of 4.3, you can match collection, `Map`, and array types through Spring's
+That said, you can match collection, `Map`, and array types through Spring's
 `@Autowired` type matching algorithm as well, as long as the element type information
 is preserved in `@Bean` return type signatures or collection inheritance hierarchies.
 In this case, you can use qualifier values to select among same-typed collections,
 as outlined in the previous paragraph.
 
-As of 4.3, `@Autowired` also considers self references for injection (that is, references
+`@Autowired` also considers self references for injection (that is, references
 back to the bean that is currently injected). Note that self injection is a fallback.
 Regular dependencies on other components always have precedence. In that sense, self
 references do not participate in regular candidate selection and are therefore in

framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/beans/definition.adoc

@@ -78,19 +78,20 @@ lead to concurrent access exceptions, inconsistent state in the bean container,
 [[beans-definition-overriding]]
 == Overriding Beans
 
-Bean overriding is happening when a bean is registered using an identifier that is
-already allocated. While bean overriding is possible, it makes the configuration harder
-to read and this feature will be deprecated in a future release.
+Bean overriding occurs when a bean is registered using an identifier that is already
+allocated. While bean overriding is possible, it makes the configuration harder to read.
+
+WARNING: Bean overriding will be deprecated in a future release.
 
 To disable bean overriding altogether, you can set the `allowBeanDefinitionOverriding`
-flag to `false` on the `ApplicationContext` before it is refreshed. In such setup, an
+flag to `false` on the `ApplicationContext` before it is refreshed. In such a setup, an
 exception is thrown if bean overriding is used.
 
-By default, the container logs every bean overriding at `INFO` level so that you can
-adapt your configuration accordingly. While not recommended, you can silence those logs
-by setting the `allowBeanDefinitionOverriding` flag to `true`.
+By default, the container logs every attempt to override a bean at `INFO` level so that
+you can adapt your configuration accordingly. While not recommended, you can silence
+those logs by setting the `allowBeanDefinitionOverriding` flag to `true`.
 
-.Java-configuration
+.Java Configuration
 ****
 If you use Java Configuration, a corresponding `@Bean` method always silently overrides
 a scanned bean class with the same component name as long as the return type of the
@@ -98,8 +99,8 @@ a scanned bean class with the same component name as long as the return type of
 the `@Bean` factory method in favor of any pre-declared constructor on the bean class.
 ****
 
-NOTE: We acknowledge that overriding beans in a test scenario is convenient,
-and there is explicit support for this as of Spring Framework 6.2. Please refer to
+NOTE: We acknowledge that overriding beans in test scenarios is convenient, and there is
+explicit support for this as of Spring Framework 6.2. Please refer to
 xref:testing/testcontext-framework/bean-overriding.adoc[this section] for more details.
 
 

framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-mockitobean.adoc

@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
 [[spring-testing-annotation-beanoverriding-mockitobean]]
 = `@MockitoBean` and `@MockitoSpyBean`
 
-`@MockitoBean` and `@MockitoSpyBean` are used on test class fields to override beans in
-the test's `ApplicationContext` with a Mockito mock or spy, respectively. In the latter
-case, the original bean definition is not replaced, but instead an early instance of the
-bean is captured and wrapped by the spy.
+`@MockitoBean` and `@MockitoSpyBean` are used on fields in test classes to override beans
+in the test's `ApplicationContext` with a Mockito mock or spy, respectively. In the
+latter case, the original bean definition is not replaced, but instead an early instance
+of the bean is captured and wrapped by the spy.
 
-By default, the annotated field's type is used to search for candidate definitions to
-override. If multiple candidates match, the usual `@Qualifier` can be provided to
-narrow the candidate to override. Alternatively, a candidate whose bean definition name
-matches the name of the field will match.
+By default, the annotated field's type is used to search for candidate bean definitions
+to override. If multiple candidates match, `@Qualifier` can be provided to narrow the
+candidate to override. Alternatively, a candidate whose bean definition name matches the
+name of the field will match.
 
 To use a by-name override rather than a by-type override, specify the `name` attribute
 of the annotation.
 
 [WARNING]
 ====
-The qualifiers, including the name of the field are used to determine if a separate
-`ApplicationContext` needs to be created. If you are using this feature to mock or
-spy the same bean in several tests, make sure to name the field consistently to avoid
+Qualifiers, including the name of the field, are used to determine if a separate
+`ApplicationContext` needs to be created. If you are using this feature to mock or spy
+the same bean in several tests, make sure to name the field consistently to avoid
 creating unnecessary contexts.
 ====
 
@@ -26,14 +26,12 @@ Each annotation also defines Mockito-specific attributes to fine-tune the mockin
 
 The `@MockitoBean` annotation uses the `REPLACE_OR_CREATE_DEFINITION`
 xref:testing/testcontext-framework/bean-overriding.adoc#testcontext-bean-overriding-custom[strategy for test bean overriding].
-
-If no definition matches, then a definition is created on-the-fly.
+If no existing bean definition matches, a new bean definition is created on the fly.
 
 The `@MockitoSpyBean` annotation uses the `WRAP_BEAN`
 xref:testing/testcontext-framework/bean-overriding.adoc#testcontext-bean-overriding-custom[strategy],
-and the original instance is wrapped in a Mockito spy.
-
-It requires that exactly one candidate definition exists.
+and the original instance is wrapped in a Mockito spy. This strategy requires that
+exactly one candidate bean definition exists.
 
 The following example shows how to use the default behavior of the `@MockitoBean` annotation:
 
@@ -44,8 +42,8 @@ Java::
 [source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
 ----
 	class OverrideBeanTests {
-		@MockitoBean  // <1>
-		private CustomService customService;
+		@MockitoBean // <1>
+		CustomService customService;
 
 		// test case body...
 	}
@@ -53,11 +51,11 @@ Java::
 <1> Replace the bean with type `CustomService` with a Mockito `mock`.
 ======
 
-In the example above, we are creating a mock for `CustomService`. If more that
-one bean with such type exist, the bean named `customService` is considered. Otherwise,
-the test will fail and you will need to provide a qualifier of some sort to identify which
-of the `CustomService` beans you want to override. If no such bean exists, a bean
-definition will be created with an auto-generated bean name.
+In the example above, we are creating a mock for `CustomService`. If more than one bean
+of that type exists, the bean named `customService` is considered. Otherwise, the test
+will fail, and you will need to provide a qualifier of some sort to identify which of the
+`CustomService` beans you want to override. If no such bean exists, a bean definition
+will be created with an auto-generated bean name.
 
 The following example uses a by-name lookup, rather than a by-type lookup:
 
@@ -68,14 +66,14 @@ Java::
 [source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
 ----
 	class OverrideBeanTests {
-		@MockitoBean(name = "service")  // <1>
-		private CustomService customService;
+		@MockitoBean(name = "service") // <1>
+		CustomService customService;
 
 		// test case body...
 
 	}
 ----
-<1> Replace the bean named  `service` with a Mockito `mock`.
+<1> Replace the bean named `service` with a Mockito `mock`.
 ======
 
 If no bean definition named `service` exists, one is created.
@@ -89,8 +87,8 @@ Java::
 [source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
 ----
 	class OverrideBeanTests {
-		@MockitoSpyBean  // <1>
-		private CustomService customService;
+		@MockitoSpyBean // <1>
+		CustomService customService;
 
 		// test case body...
 	}
@@ -98,10 +96,10 @@ Java::
 <1> Wrap the bean with type `CustomService` with a Mockito `spy`.
 ======
 
-In the example above, we are wrapping the bean with type `CustomService`. If more that
-one bean with such type exist, the bean named `customService` is considered. Otherwise,
-the test will fail and you will need to provide a qualifier of some sort to identify which
-of the `CustomService` beans you want to spy.
+In the example above, we are wrapping the bean with type `CustomService`. If more than
+one bean of that type exists, the bean named `customService` is considered. Otherwise,
+the test will fail, and you will need to provide a qualifier of some sort to identify
+which of the `CustomService` beans you want to spy.
 
 The following example uses a by-name lookup, rather than a by-type lookup:
 
@@ -112,12 +110,12 @@ Java::
 [source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
 ----
 	class OverrideBeanTests {
-		@MockitoSpyBean(name = "service")  // <1>
-		private CustomService customService;
+		@MockitoSpyBean(name = "service") // <1>
+		CustomService customService;
 
 		// test case body...
 
 	}
 ----
-<1> Wrap the bean named  `service` with a Mockito `spy`.
+<1> Wrap the bean named `service` with a Mockito `spy`.
 ======

framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-testbean.adoc

@@ -1,30 +1,29 @@
 [[spring-testing-annotation-beanoverriding-testbean]]
 = `@TestBean`
 
-`@TestBean` is used on a test class field to override a specific bean in the test's
-`ApplicationContext` with an instance provided by a conventionally named static factory
-method.
+`@TestBean` is used on a field in a test class to override a specific bean in the test's
+`ApplicationContext` with an instance provided by a factory method.
 
-The associated factory method name is derived from the annotated field's name, or bean
-name if specified. A `static` method with no argument that returns a type compatible
-with the type of the bean to override is expected. To make things more explicit, or if
-you'd rather use a different name, the annotation allows for a specific method name to
-be provided.
+The associated factory method name is derived from the annotated field's name, or the
+bean name if specified. The factory method must be `static`, accept no arguments, and
+have a return type compatible with the type of the bean to override. To make things more
+explicit, or if you'd rather use a different name, the annotation allows for a specific
+method name to be provided.
 
-By default, the annotated field's type is used to search for candidate definitions to
-override. If multiple candidates match, the usual `@Qualifier` can be provided to
-narrow the candidate to override. Alternatively, a candidate whose bean definition name
-matches the name of the field will match.
+By default, the annotated field's type is used to search for candidate bean definitions
+to override. If multiple candidates match, `@Qualifier` can be provided to narrow the
+candidate to override. Alternatively, a candidate whose bean definition name matches the
+name of the field will match.
 
 To use a by-name override rather than a by-type override, specify the `name` attribute
 of the annotation.
 
 [WARNING]
 ====
-The qualifiers, including the name of the field are used to determine if a separate
-`ApplicationContext` needs to be created. If you are using this feature to override
-the same bean in several tests, make sure to name the field consistently to avoid
-creating unnecessary contexts.
+Qualifiers, including the name of the field, are used to determine if a separate
+`ApplicationContext` needs to be created. If you are using this feature to override the
+same bean in several tests, make sure to name the field consistently to avoid creating
+unnecessary contexts.
 ====
 
 The following example shows how to use the default behavior of the `@TestBean` annotation:
@@ -36,25 +35,24 @@ Java::
 [source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
 ----
 	class OverrideBeanTests {
-		@TestBean  // <1>
-		private CustomService customService;
+		@TestBean // <1>
+		CustomService customService;
 
 		// test case body...
 
-		private static CustomService customService() { // <2>
+		static CustomService customService() { // <2>
 			return new MyFakeCustomService();
 		}
 	}
 ----
-<1> Mark a field for overriding of the bean with type `CustomService`.
+<1> Mark a field for overriding the bean with type `CustomService`.
 <2> The result of this static method will be used as the instance and injected into the field.
 ======
 
-In the example above, we are overriding the bean with type `CustomService`. If more that
-one bean with such type exist, the bean named `customService` is considered. Otherwise,
-the test will fail and you will need to provide a qualifier of some sort to identify which
-of the `CustomService` beans you want to override.
-
+In the example above, we are overriding the bean with type `CustomService`. If more than
+one bean of that type exists, the bean named `customService` is considered. Otherwise,
+the test will fail, and you will need to provide a qualifier of some sort to identify
+which of the `CustomService` beans you want to override.
 
 The following example uses a by-name lookup, rather than a by-type lookup:
 
@@ -65,17 +63,18 @@ Java::
 [source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
 ----
 	class OverrideBeanTests {
-		@TestBean(name = "service", methodName = "createCustomService")  // <1>
-		private CustomService customService;
+		@TestBean(name = "service", methodName = "createCustomService") // <1>
+		CustomService customService;
 
 		// test case body...
 
-		private static CustomService createCustomService() { // <2>
+		static CustomService createCustomService() { // <2>
 			return new MyFakeCustomService();
 		}
 	}
 ----
-<1> Mark a field for overriding of the bean with name `service`.
+<1> Mark a field for overriding the bean with name `service`, and specify that the
+    factory method is named `createCustomService`.
 <2> The result of this static method will be used as the instance and injected into the field.
 ======
 

spring-test/src/main/java/org/springframework/test/context/bean/override/OverrideMetadata.java

@@ -74,14 +74,15 @@ public abstract class OverrideMetadata {
 	}
 
 	/**
-	 * Parse the given {@code testClass} and provide the use of bean override.
+	 * Parse the given {@code testClass} and build the corresponding list of
+	 * bean {@code OverrideMetadata}.
 	 * @param testClass the class to parse
-	 * @return a list of bean overrides metadata
+	 * @return a list of {@code OverrideMetadata}
 	 */
 	public static List<OverrideMetadata> forTestClass(Class<?> testClass) {
-		List<OverrideMetadata> all = new LinkedList<>();
-		ReflectionUtils.doWithFields(testClass, field -> parseField(field, testClass, all));
-		return all;
+		List<OverrideMetadata> metadataList = new LinkedList<>();
+		ReflectionUtils.doWithFields(testClass, field -> parseField(field, testClass, metadataList));
+		return metadataList;
 	}
 
 	private static void parseField(Field field, Class<?> testClass, List<OverrideMetadata> metadataList) {
@@ -182,9 +183,9 @@ public abstract class OverrideMetadata {
 
 	@Override
 	public int hashCode() {
-		int hash = Objects.hash(getClass().hashCode(), this.beanType.getType(), this.beanName, this.strategy);
+		int hash = Objects.hash(getClass(), this.beanType.getType(), this.beanName, this.strategy);
 		return (this.beanName != null ? hash : hash +
-				Objects.hash(this.field.getName(), Arrays.hashCode(this.field.getAnnotations())));
+				31 * Objects.hash(this.field.getName(), Arrays.hashCode(this.field.getAnnotations())));
 	}
 
 	@Override