|
|
|
@ -3297,15 +3297,22 @@ is cleared. For further details, see the discussion of `@DirtiesContext` in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you use the `DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener` (which is configured by |
|
|
|
When you use the `DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener` (which is configured by |
|
|
|
default), the dependencies of your test instances are injected from beans in the |
|
|
|
default), the dependencies of your test instances are injected from beans in the |
|
|
|
application context that you configured with `@ContextConfiguration`. You may use setter |
|
|
|
application context that you configured with `@ContextConfiguration` or related |
|
|
|
injection, field injection, or both, depending on which annotations you choose and |
|
|
|
annotations. You may use setter injection, field injection, or both, depending on which |
|
|
|
whether you place them on setter methods or fields. For consistency with the annotation |
|
|
|
annotations you choose and whether you place them on setter methods or fields. If you are |
|
|
|
support introduced in Spring 2.5 and 3.0, you can use Spring's `@Autowired` annotation or |
|
|
|
using JUnit Jupiter you may also optionally use constructor injection (see |
|
|
|
the `@Inject` annotation from JSR 330. |
|
|
|
<<testcontext-junit-jupiter-di>>). For consistency with the annotation support introduced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Spring 2.5 and 3.0, you can use Spring's `@Autowired` annotation or the `@Inject` |
|
|
|
TIP: The TestContext framework does not instrument the manner in which a test instance is |
|
|
|
annotation from JSR 330 for field and setter injection. |
|
|
|
instantiated. Thus, the use of `@Autowired` or `@Inject` for constructors has no effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for test classes. |
|
|
|
TIP: For testing frameworks other than JUnit Jupiter, the TestContext framework does not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
participate in instantiation of the test class. Thus, the use of `@Autowired` or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`@Inject` for constructors has no effect for test classes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Although field injection is discouraged in production code, field injection is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actually quite natural in test code. The rationale for the difference is that you will |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
never instantiate your test class directly. Consequently, there is no need to be able to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invoke a `public` constructor or setter method on your test class. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because `@Autowired` is used to perform <<core.adoc#beans-factory-autowire, autowiring by |
|
|
|
Because `@Autowired` is used to perform <<core.adoc#beans-factory-autowire, autowiring by |
|
|
|
type>>, if you have multiple bean definitions of the same type, you cannot rely on this |
|
|
|
type>>, if you have multiple bean definitions of the same type, you cannot rely on this |
|
|
|
@ -3313,7 +3320,7 @@ approach for those particular beans. In that case, you can use `@Autowired` in |
|
|
|
conjunction with `@Qualifier`. As of Spring 3.0, you can also choose to use `@Inject` in |
|
|
|
conjunction with `@Qualifier`. As of Spring 3.0, you can also choose to use `@Inject` in |
|
|
|
conjunction with `@Named`. Alternatively, if your test class has access to its |
|
|
|
conjunction with `@Named`. Alternatively, if your test class has access to its |
|
|
|
`ApplicationContext`, you can perform an explicit lookup by using (for example) a call to |
|
|
|
`ApplicationContext`, you can perform an explicit lookup by using (for example) a call to |
|
|
|
`applicationContext.getBean("titleRepository")`. |
|
|
|
`applicationContext.getBean("titleRepository", TitleRepository.class)`. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you do not want dependency injection applied to your test instances, do not annotate |
|
|
|
If you do not want dependency injection applied to your test instances, do not annotate |
|
|
|
fields or setter methods with `@Autowired` or `@Inject`. Alternatively, you can disable |
|
|
|
fields or setter methods with `@Autowired` or `@Inject`. Alternatively, you can disable |
|
|
|
@ -3329,7 +3336,7 @@ is presented after all sample code listings. |
|
|
|
[NOTE] |
|
|
|
[NOTE] |
|
|
|
==== |
|
|
|
==== |
|
|
|
The dependency injection behavior in the following code listings is not specific to JUnit |
|
|
|
The dependency injection behavior in the following code listings is not specific to JUnit |
|
|
|
4. The same DI techniques can be used in conjunction with any testing framework. |
|
|
|
4. The same DI techniques can be used in conjunction with any supported testing framework. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following examples make calls to static assertion methods, such as `assertNotNull()`, |
|
|
|
The following examples make calls to static assertion methods, such as `assertNotNull()`, |
|
|
|
but without prepending the call with `Assert`. In such cases, assume that the method was |
|
|
|
but without prepending the call with `Assert`. In such cases, assume that the method was |
|
|
|
|