|
|
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
|
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN" |
|
|
|
|
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd"> |
|
|
|
|
<chapter> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Spring REST support </title> |
|
|
|
|
<chapter id="rest"> |
|
|
|
|
<title>REST support</title> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Introduction</title> |
|
|
|
|
@ -23,7 +21,7 @@
@@ -23,7 +21,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
url="http://blog.springsource.com/2009/03/08/rest-in-spring-3-mvc/">entry</ulink>.) |
|
|
|
|
With little effort, you can marshall data out of a RESTful request using |
|
|
|
|
@RequestMapping and @PathVariable annotations and return different views |
|
|
|
|
as determined by the request's Context-Type header. </para> |
|
|
|
|
as determined by the request's Context-Type header.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>In this chapter we describe all the features of Spring's REST |
|
|
|
|
support. It is divided into two main two chapters, one for the server-side |
|
|
|
|
@ -31,7 +29,7 @@
@@ -31,7 +29,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
linkend="mvc">MVC framework</link>, you may want to read through the |
|
|
|
|
reference documentation on <link linkend="mvc-annotation">annotation-based |
|
|
|
|
controller configuration</link> to undestand the general programming |
|
|
|
|
model. </para> |
|
|
|
|
model.</para> |
|
|
|
|
</section> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
@ -40,7 +38,7 @@
@@ -40,7 +38,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Spring's annotation-based MVC framework serves as the basis for |
|
|
|
|
creating RESTful Web Services. As such, you configure your servlet |
|
|
|
|
container as you would for a Spring MVC application using Spring's <link |
|
|
|
|
linkend="mvc-servlet">DispatcherServlet</link>. </para> |
|
|
|
|
linkend="mvc-servlet">DispatcherServlet</link>.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
<title>URI templates</title> |
|
|
|
|
@ -60,7 +58,7 @@
@@ -60,7 +58,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting>http://www.example.com/users/fred</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>When processing an request the URI can be compared to an expected |
|
|
|
|
URI Template in order to extract a collection of variables. </para> |
|
|
|
|
URI Template in order to extract a collection of variables.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Spring uses the <classname>@RequestMapping</classname> annotation |
|
|
|
|
to define the URI Template for the request. |
|
|
|
|
@ -75,15 +73,14 @@ public String getUser(@PathVariable String userId) {
@@ -75,15 +73,14 @@ public String getUser(@PathVariable String userId) {
|
|
|
|
|
}</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The request <literal>http://www.example.com/users/fred</literal> |
|
|
|
|
will bind the userId method parameter to the String value 'fred'. |
|
|
|
|
</para> |
|
|
|
|
will bind the userId method parameter to the String value 'fred'.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section id="path-variable"> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Mapping RESTful URLs with the @PathVariable annotation</title> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The <classname>@PathVariable</classname> method level annotation |
|
|
|
|
is used to indicate that a method parameter should be bound to the |
|
|
|
|
value of a URI template variable. </para> |
|
|
|
|
value of a URI template variable.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The following code snippet shows the use of a single |
|
|
|
|
<classname>@PathVariable</classname> in a controller method:</para> |
|
|
|
|
@ -101,7 +98,7 @@ public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis> String ow
@@ -101,7 +98,7 @@ public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis> String ow
|
|
|
|
|
request, the value of ownerId is set the the value in the request URI. |
|
|
|
|
For example, when a request comes in for /owners/fred, the value |
|
|
|
|
'fred' is bound to the method parameter <literal>String |
|
|
|
|
ownerId</literal>. </para> |
|
|
|
|
ownerId</literal>.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The matching of method parameter names to URI Template variable |
|
|
|
|
names can only be done if your code is compiled with debugging |
|
|
|
|
@ -109,7 +106,7 @@ public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis> String ow
@@ -109,7 +106,7 @@ public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis> String ow
|
|
|
|
|
name of the URI Template variable name to bind to in the @PathVariable |
|
|
|
|
annotation. For example</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting>@RequestMapping("/owners/{ownerId}", method=RequestMethod.GET) |
|
|
|
|
<programlisting language="java">@RequestMapping("/owners/{ownerId}", method=RequestMethod.GET) |
|
|
|
|
public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis>("ownerId") String ownerId, Model model) { |
|
|
|
|
// implementation omitted |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
@ -119,7 +116,7 @@ public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis>("ownerId"
@@ -119,7 +116,7 @@ public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis>("ownerId"
|
|
|
|
|
so you may also use create a controlled method with the signature |
|
|
|
|
shown below</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting>@RequestMapping("/owners/{ownerId}", method=RequestMethod.GET) |
|
|
|
|
<programlisting language="java">@RequestMapping("/owners/{ownerId}", method=RequestMethod.GET) |
|
|
|
|
public String findOwner(<emphasis role="bold">@PathVariable</emphasis>("ownerId") String theOwner, Model model) { |
|
|
|
|
// implementation omitted |
|
|
|
|
}</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
@ -163,9 +160,150 @@ public class RelativePathUriTemplateController {
@@ -163,9 +160,150 @@ public class RelativePathUriTemplateController {
|
|
|
|
|
</section> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Content Negotiation</title> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Returning multiple representations</title> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>A RESTful architecture may expose multiple representations of a |
|
|
|
|
resource. There are two strategies for a client to inform the server of |
|
|
|
|
the representation it is interested in receiving.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The first strategy is to use a distinct URI for each resource. |
|
|
|
|
This is typically done by using a different file extension in the URI. |
|
|
|
|
For example the URI<literal> |
|
|
|
|
http://www.example.com/users/fred.pdf</literal> requests a PDF |
|
|
|
|
representation of the user fred while |
|
|
|
|
<literal>http://www.example.com/users/fred.xml</literal> requests an XML |
|
|
|
|
representation.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The second strategy is for the client to use the same URI to |
|
|
|
|
locate the resource but set the <literal>Accept</literal> HTTP request |
|
|
|
|
header to list the <ulink |
|
|
|
|
url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_media_type">media |
|
|
|
|
types</ulink> that it understands. For example, a HTTP request for |
|
|
|
|
<literal>http://www.example.com/users/fred</literal> with an |
|
|
|
|
<literal>Accept</literal> header set to <literal>application/pdf |
|
|
|
|
</literal>requests a PDF representation of the user fred while |
|
|
|
|
<literal>http://www.example.com/users/fred</literal> with an |
|
|
|
|
<literal>Accept</literal> header set to <literal>text/xml</literal> |
|
|
|
|
requests an XML representation. This strategy is known as <ulink |
|
|
|
|
url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_negotiation">content |
|
|
|
|
negotiation</ulink>.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<note> |
|
|
|
|
<para>One issue with the Accept header is that is impossible to change |
|
|
|
|
it in a web browser, in HTML. For instance, in Firefox, it's fixed |
|
|
|
|
to</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting>Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 |
|
|
|
|
</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>blah blah</para> |
|
|
|
|
<para>For this reason it is common to see the use of a distinct URI |
|
|
|
|
for each representation.</para> |
|
|
|
|
</note> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>To support multiple representations of a resource Spring provides |
|
|
|
|
the <classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname> to resolve a |
|
|
|
|
view based on the file extension or <literal>Accept</literal> header of |
|
|
|
|
the HTTP request. <classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname> |
|
|
|
|
does not perform the view resolution itself, but instead delegates to a |
|
|
|
|
list of view resolvers set using the property |
|
|
|
|
<literal>ViewResolvers</literal>.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The <classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname> selects |
|
|
|
|
an appropriate <classname>View</classname> to handle the request by |
|
|
|
|
comparing the request media type(s) with the media type (a.k.a. |
|
|
|
|
<literal>Content-Type</literal>) supported by the |
|
|
|
|
<classname>View</classname> associated with each of its |
|
|
|
|
<classname>ViewResolvers</classname>. The first |
|
|
|
|
<classname>View</classname> in the list that has a compatible |
|
|
|
|
<literal>Content-Type</literal> is used to return the representation to |
|
|
|
|
the client. The <literal>Accept</literal> header may include wild cards, |
|
|
|
|
for example 'text/*', in which case a <classname>View</classname> whose |
|
|
|
|
Context-Type was 'text/xml' is a compatible match.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>To support the resolution of a view based on a file extension, |
|
|
|
|
<classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname>'s property |
|
|
|
|
<literal>MediaTypes</literal> is used to specify a mapping of file |
|
|
|
|
extensions to media types. For more information on the algorithm to |
|
|
|
|
determine the request media type, refer to the API documentation for |
|
|
|
|
<classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname>..</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Here is an example configuration of a |
|
|
|
|
<classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname></para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting language="xml"> <bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.ContentNegotiatingViewResolver"> |
|
|
|
|
<property name="mediaTypes"> |
|
|
|
|
<map> |
|
|
|
|
<entry key="atom" value="application/atom+xml"/> |
|
|
|
|
<entry key="html" value="text/html"/> |
|
|
|
|
</map> |
|
|
|
|
</property> |
|
|
|
|
<property name="viewResolvers"> |
|
|
|
|
<list> |
|
|
|
|
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.BeanNameViewResolver"/> |
|
|
|
|
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.InternalResourceViewResolver"> |
|
|
|
|
<property name="prefix" value="/WEB-INF/jsp/"/> |
|
|
|
|
<property name="suffix" value=".jsp"/> |
|
|
|
|
</bean> |
|
|
|
|
</list> |
|
|
|
|
</property> |
|
|
|
|
</bean> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<bean id="content" class="com.springsource.samples.rest.SampleContentAtomView"/></programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The <classname>InternalResourceViewResolver</classname> handles |
|
|
|
|
the translation of view names and JSP pages while the |
|
|
|
|
<classname>BeanNameViewResolver</classname> returns a view based on the |
|
|
|
|
name of a bean. (See "<link |
|
|
|
|
linkend="mvc-viewresolver-resolver">Resolving views - the ViewResolver |
|
|
|
|
interface</link>" for more details on how Spring looks up and |
|
|
|
|
instantiates a view.) In this example, the <literal>content</literal> |
|
|
|
|
bean is a class that inherits from |
|
|
|
|
<classname>AbstractAtomFeedView</classname> which returns an Atom RSS |
|
|
|
|
feed. For more information on creating an Atom Feed representation see |
|
|
|
|
the section 'Atom Views'. </para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>In this configuration, if a request is made with a .html extension |
|
|
|
|
the view resolver will look for a view that matches the text/html media |
|
|
|
|
type. The <classname>InternalResourceViewResolver</classname> provides |
|
|
|
|
the matching view for text/html. If the request is made with the file |
|
|
|
|
extension .atom, the view resolver will look for a view that matches the |
|
|
|
|
application/atom+xml media type. This view is provided by the |
|
|
|
|
<classname>BeanNameViewResolver</classname> that maps to the |
|
|
|
|
<classname>SampleContentAtomView</classname> if the view name returned |
|
|
|
|
is 'content'. Alternatively, client requests could be made without a |
|
|
|
|
file extension and setting the Accept header to the preferred media-type |
|
|
|
|
and the same resolution of request to views would be occur.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<note> |
|
|
|
|
<para>If <classname>ContentNegotiatingViewResolver</classname>'s list |
|
|
|
|
of ViewResolvers is not configured explicitly, then it will |
|
|
|
|
automatically use any ViewResolvers defined in the application |
|
|
|
|
context.</para> |
|
|
|
|
</note> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The corresponding controller code that returns an Atom RSS feed |
|
|
|
|
for a URI of the form <literal>http://localhost/content.atom</literal> |
|
|
|
|
or <literal>http://localhost/content</literal> with an |
|
|
|
|
<literal>Accept</literal> header of application/atom+xml is shown |
|
|
|
|
below</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting language="java">@Controller |
|
|
|
|
public class ContentController { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private List<SampleContent> contentList = new ArrayList<SampleContent>(); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@RequestMapping(value="/content", method=RequestMethod.GET) |
|
|
|
|
public ModelAndView getContent() { |
|
|
|
|
ModelAndView mav = new ModelAndView(); |
|
|
|
|
mav.setViewName("content"); |
|
|
|
|
mav.addObject("sampleContentList", contentList); |
|
|
|
|
return mav; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para></para> |
|
|
|
|
</section> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
@ -177,13 +315,86 @@ public class RelativePathUriTemplateController {
@@ -177,13 +315,86 @@ public class RelativePathUriTemplateController {
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
<title>HTTP Method Conversion</title> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>blah blah</para> |
|
|
|
|
<para>Another key principle of REST is the use of the Uniform Interface. |
|
|
|
|
This means that all resources (URLs) can be manipulated using the same |
|
|
|
|
four HTTP method: GET, PUT, POST, and DELETE. For each of methods, the |
|
|
|
|
HTTP specification defines exact semantics. For instance, a GET should |
|
|
|
|
always be a safe operation, meaning that is has no side effects, and a |
|
|
|
|
PUT or DELETE should be idempotent, meaning that you can repeat these |
|
|
|
|
operations over and over again, but the end result should be the same. |
|
|
|
|
While HTTP defines these four methods, HTML only supports two: GET and |
|
|
|
|
POST. Fortunately, there are two possible workarounds: you can either |
|
|
|
|
use JavaScript to do your PUT or DELETE, or simply do a POST with the |
|
|
|
|
'real' method as an additional parameter (modeled as a hidden input |
|
|
|
|
field in an HTML form). This latter trick is what the |
|
|
|
|
<classname>HiddenHttpMethodFilter</classname> does. This filter was |
|
|
|
|
introduced in Spring 3.0 M1, and is a plain Servlet Filter. As such, it |
|
|
|
|
can be used in combination with any web framework (not just Spring MVC). |
|
|
|
|
Simply add this filter to your web.xml, and a POST with a hidden _method |
|
|
|
|
parameter will be converted into the corresponding HTTP method |
|
|
|
|
request.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Supporting Spring form tags</title> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>To support HTTP method conversion the Spring MVC form tag was |
|
|
|
|
updated to support setting the HTTP method. For example, the following |
|
|
|
|
snippet taken from the updated Petclinic sample</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting language="html"><form:form method="delete"> |
|
|
|
|
<p class="submit"><input type="submit" value="Delete Pet"/></p> |
|
|
|
|
</form:form></programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>This will actually perform an HTTP POST, with the 'real' DELETE |
|
|
|
|
method hidden behind a request parameter, to be picked up by the |
|
|
|
|
<classname>HiddenHttpMethodFilter</classname>. The corresponding |
|
|
|
|
@Controller method is shown below</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<programlisting language="java">@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.DELETE) |
|
|
|
|
public String deletePet(@PathVariable int ownerId, @PathVariable int petId) { |
|
|
|
|
this.clinic.deletePet(petId); |
|
|
|
|
return "redirect:/owners/" + ownerId; |
|
|
|
|
}</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
</section> |
|
|
|
|
</section> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
<title>ETag support</title> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>blah blah</para> |
|
|
|
|
<para>An <ulink |
|
|
|
|
url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_ETag">ETag</ulink> (entity tag) |
|
|
|
|
is an HTTP response header returned by an HTTP/1.1 compliant web server |
|
|
|
|
used to determine change in content at a given URL. It can be considered |
|
|
|
|
to be the more sophisticated successor to the |
|
|
|
|
<literal>Last-Modified</literal> header. When a server returns a |
|
|
|
|
representation with an ETag header, client can use this header in |
|
|
|
|
subsequent GETs, in a <literal>If-None-Match</literal> header. If the |
|
|
|
|
content has not changed, the server will return <literal>304: Not |
|
|
|
|
Modified</literal>.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Support for ETags is provided by the servlet filter |
|
|
|
|
<classname>ShallowEtagHeaderFilter</classname>. Since it is a plain |
|
|
|
|
Servlet Filter, and thus can be used in combination any web framework. |
|
|
|
|
The <classname>ShallowEtagHeaderFilter</classname> filter creates |
|
|
|
|
so-called shallow ETags (as opposed to a deep ETags, more about that |
|
|
|
|
later). The way it works is quite simple: the filter simply caches the |
|
|
|
|
content of the rendered JSP (or other content), generates a MD5 hash |
|
|
|
|
over that, and returns that as a ETag header in the response. The next |
|
|
|
|
time a client sends a request for the same resource, it use that hash as |
|
|
|
|
the <literal>If-None-Match</literal> value. The filter notices this, |
|
|
|
|
renders the view again, and compares the two hashes. If they are equal, |
|
|
|
|
a <literal>304</literal> is returned. It is important to note that this |
|
|
|
|
filter will not save processing power, as the view is still rendered. |
|
|
|
|
The only thing it saves is bandwith, as the rendered response is not |
|
|
|
|
sent back over the wire.</para> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Deep ETags are a bit more complicated. In this case, the ETag is |
|
|
|
|
based on the underlying domain objects, RDMBS tables, etc. Using this |
|
|
|
|
approach, no content is generated unless the underlying data has |
|
|
|
|
changed. Unfortunately, implementing this approach in a generic way is |
|
|
|
|
much more difficult than shallow ETags. Spring may provide support for |
|
|
|
|
deep ETags in a later release by relying on JPA's @Version annotation, |
|
|
|
|
or an AspectJ aspect.</para> |
|
|
|
|
</section> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section> |
|
|
|
|
|