Browse Source

Polishing

pull/33720/head
Sam Brannen 1 year ago
parent
commit
29fdcf56eb
  1. 2
      framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/beans/dependencies/factory-collaborators.adoc
  2. 2
      framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/beans/java/composing-configuration-classes.adoc

2
framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/beans/dependencies/factory-collaborators.adoc

@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Kotlin::
.[[beans-factory-ctor-arguments-type]]Constructor argument type matching .[[beans-factory-ctor-arguments-type]]Constructor argument type matching
-- --
In the preceding scenario, the container can use type matching with simple types if In the preceding scenario, the container can use type matching with simple types if
you explicitly specify the type of the constructor argument by using the `type` attribute, you explicitly specify the type of the constructor argument via the `type` attribute,
as the following example shows: as the following example shows:
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"] [source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]

2
framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/beans/java/composing-configuration-classes.adoc

@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ the configuration model, in that references to other beans must be valid Java sy
Fortunately, solving this problem is simple. As Fortunately, solving this problem is simple. As
xref:core/beans/java/bean-annotation.adoc#beans-java-dependencies[we already discussed], xref:core/beans/java/bean-annotation.adoc#beans-java-dependencies[we already discussed],
a `@Bean` method can have an arbitrary number of parameters that describe the bean a `@Bean` method can have an arbitrary number of parameters that describe the bean
dependencies. Consider the following more real-world scenario with several `@Configuration` dependencies. Consider the following more realistic scenario with several `@Configuration`
classes, each depending on beans declared in the others: classes, each depending on beans declared in the others:
[tabs] [tabs]

Loading…
Cancel
Save