@ -66,11 +66,12 @@ The table of the referenced entity is expected to have an additional column with
@@ -66,11 +66,12 @@ The table of the referenced entity is expected to have an additional column with
The table of the referenced entity is expected to have two additional columns: One named based on the referencing entity for the foreign key (see <<jdbc.entity-persistence.types.backrefs>>) and one with the same name and an additional `_key` suffix for the map key.
* `List<some entity>` is mapped as a `Map<Integer, some entity>`. The same additional columns are expected and the names used can be customized in the same way.
+
For `List`, `Set`, and `Map` naming of the back reference can be controlled by implementing `NamingStrategy.getReverseColumnName(RelationalPersistentEntity<?> owner)` and `NamingStrategy.getKeyColumn(RelationalPersistentProperty property)`, respectively.
Alternatively you may annotate the attribute with `@MappedCollection(idColumn="your_column_name", keyColumn="your_key_column_name")`.
Specifying a key column for a `Set` has no effect.
* Types for which you registered suitable xref:#mapping.explicit.converters[custom converters].
You should not include attributes in your entities to hold the actual value of a back reference, nor of the key column of maps or lists.
If you want these value to be available in your domain model we recommend to do this in a `AfterConvertCallback` and store the values in transient values.
* Types for which you registered suitable [[jdbc.custom-converters, custom conversions]].