Recommend Java records instead of Lombok for class-based projections.

Closes #2793
Original pull request: #2794

src/main/asciidoc/repository-projections.adoc

@@ -237,46 +237,12 @@ The following example shows a projecting DTO:
 ====
 [source, java]
 ----
-class NamesOnly {
-
-  private final String firstname, lastname;
-
-  NamesOnly(String firstname, String lastname) {
-
-    this.firstname = firstname;
-    this.lastname = lastname;
-  }
-
-  String getFirstname() {
-    return this.firstname;
-  }
-
-  String getLastname() {
-    return this.lastname;
-  }
-
-  // equals(…) and hashCode() implementations
+record NamesOnly(String firstname, String lastname) {
 }
 ----
 ====
 
-[TIP]
-.Avoid boilerplate code for projection DTOs
-====
-You can dramatically simplify the code for a DTO by using https://projectlombok.org[Project Lombok], which provides an `@Value` annotation (not to be confused with Spring's `@Value` annotation shown in the earlier interface examples).
-If you use Project Lombok's `@Value` annotation, the sample DTO shown earlier would become the following:
-
-[source,java]
-----
-@Value
-class NamesOnly {
-	String firstname, lastname;
-}
-----
-
-Fields are `private final` by default, and the class exposes a constructor that takes all fields and automatically gets `equals(…)` and `hashCode()` methods implemented.
-
-====
+Records are ideal DTOs since they adhere to value semantics (all fields are private final, `equals(…)` and `hashCode()` are provided by default), but you are free to use any class with a constructor listing the fields to be retrieved.
 
 ifdef::repository-projections-trailing-dto-fragment[]
 include::{repository-projections-trailing-dto-fragment}[]